Crumpet:
GOD IS THE EPITOME OF EVIL - he makes Hitler look like a pussy cat.
If God is evil how do you term the devil?
by hibiscusfire 367 Replies latest members adult
Crumpet:
GOD IS THE EPITOME OF EVIL - he makes Hitler look like a pussy cat.
If God is evil how do you term the devil?
Although defense can also be intentional for yourself or others. Like a polisman shouts a kidnapper or something like it.
The policeman is carrying out his duty...the law. However if the police took up a gun and says to himself ..."Ah I'm going to get that punk who stole my girlfriend!
He goes and finds the punk and shoots him...now that is intentional. Revenge is somehow intentional as to a "Hey kidnapper on the run! Stop or I will shoot!" Kidnapper ignores the warning. Then POW POW! Well what can I say.
"If there ever has been such a thing as sin, then animal sacrifices are clearly a sin, and any god who would accept or enjoy that is a gross and primitive tyrant." This depends on the context...common sense would tell you that. Are you a vegetarian? Or do you eat meat eh?
It depends? For you it does, because your so-called moral code is inherently contradictory and arbitrary: Killing isn't right or wrong - it only depends on the whim of your puppet god and his ruling class at the time. Theft isn't right or wrong, it's a whim of the ruling class using religion to blugeon the masses brain dead. Pillage and genocide. Oil and empire. Power always, to the end of the long last night. Common sense does not tell me that animal sacrifices are a just means of exculpation. Common sense tells me that if the *most important and powerful* being is invisible, indistiguishible from all competing claims of godhood, and by all applications of science and reason completely made-up, then she doesn't exist. Common sense tells me that if as long as she has been imagined, her worship has served as a foundation for wars and oppression, then her worship has nothing to do with an actual application of grace, vision, and courage for humanity. Yes, I eat animals. I wasn't the one who tried to obfuscate my own leading question by fuzzying up the logic. Killing animals for the sake of illustration is a different matter. Now answer some of the hard questions that you are avoiding. It does not depend on the context. It depends on the content. Context is a meaning that we generate. There is no context in the universe. An is is an is. Now deal with one actual, real issue, without resorting to sophistry and yeah-buts. Your theocratic warfare is impotent. If you and the christian fascists take your international agenda further, it will be met with secular warfare. Unlike your god, bombs exist. Wax on about counterfactual historical claims of the "streams of truth" all you want. The streams are all piss, and the leaders of this system are having a grand laugh at your expense as they twist the screws of imperialism with your tacit support of trumped up non-issue electoral decision making. Nobody is coming to save us.
mrsjones do you masterbate?Hibiscusfire
Yes I do.
Josie ~ No shame in my game
shall we make it another thread, "all raise one hand who masturbates?"Maybe it is not really to the point here on this thread
Too late heehee
Spook:
Common sense does not tell me that animal sacrifices are a just means of exculpation.
When Jesus came as the human sacrifice the animal sacrifice was done away with.
Killing or capturing (catching) animals for food is a little bit different from animal sacrifices.
Eg certain heavy metal rockers sacrificed animals to the devil to improve their performance. They would cut off the goat's head, drink the blood and include the drugs.
Rock Music Makes Rich WretchesUnlike christism, which makes poor, opressed wretches and rich oppressive rulers. Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't you believe in a magical book, invisible spirits, incantations to supernatural beings, etc? Sounds pretty occult to me. At least they don't collusively obstruct the state.
Sounds like Harry Potter
Again, you avoid the issue. Stop cowering away. Is it good and right to sacrifice animals or not? If it is immoral, then you god is immoral. If it is not, then don't condemn others who do it. If it depends, then admit that you have no real morals other than obedience to the whim of your deity. I hold you as exactly the same as those "heavy metal rockers" if you support animal sacrifice.
The one way you can salvage your humanity is to admit: The bible reflects a great deal of ancient myths and practices, reflecting primitive culture. We should learn what value we can from it, but as a perfect moral guide it falls short. Therefore, let us evaluate the assertions of the bible as we would evaluate any other claim about the way things should be.
And, no, the animal sacrifice was not done away with when and if he came. It was done away with by the Pauline sect in competing with James and Peter, Paul being the one who wanted to do away with many of the Jewish traditions so that christers could grow in number among the Roman world where people liked to eat differently and not have parts of their genitals mutilated.
Spook:Common sense does not tell me that animal sacrifices are ;a just ;means of exculpation.
When Jesus came as the human sacrifice the animal sacrifice was done away with.
Killing or capturing (catching) animals for food is a little bit different from animal sacrifices.
Eg certain heavy metal rockers sacrificed animals to the devil to improve their performance. They would cut off the goat's head, drink the blood and include the drugs.
ok, no other thread then:
mrsjones do you masterbate?Hibiscusfire
Yes I do.
Josie ~ No shame in my game
Can you prove it?