inthepink3355
JoinedTopics Started by inthepink3355
-
45
Spiritual food = Dub grub....whadayathink???
by Alpaca ini coined this the other day on another thread and it seemed to get a laugh out of a few people.. and since were talking about it, what other great terms could we come up with in the spirit of "the borg," the filthful and disgraceful slavebugger (a fave of mine)......??
?.
-
32
Is the Watchtower really wrong according to your standards?
by hamilcarr in'we all have a priori knowledge, so we can't claim objective knowledge.
by the way, our senses only observe part of reality.
then, how do you dare asserting that you're right?
-
36
What should I do with all of these books?
by Confession inwhile growing up, my dad maintained a rather huge wts library.
i liked the idea of being able to pick out one of those old books from the1940s or earlier and read what they were saying back then.
well for the first time, in september of 2006 at the age of 40, i finally became a home-owner.
-
21
Blondie's Comments You Will Not Hear at the 5-18-08 WT Study (WISE)
by blondie in"who is wise and understanding among you?".
"who is wise and understanding among you?
let him show out of his fine conduct his works with a mildness that belongs to wisdom.".
-
73
What's Your MAIN Reason For Not Believing In "The Truth"?
by minimus inmy mother had this discussion yesterday.
basically, my main argument was that if the fds gets jehovah's holy spirit and their "food" is "the truth", yet they always are correcting themselves, how can anyone in all fairness believe it's "the truth"??
you can't show scripturally why organ transplants are a form of cannibalism and clearly a disfellowshipping offense and a couple of years later after possible disfellowshippings or death, and then believe jehovah god changed his view suddenly.
-
21
The name "Jehovah's Witnesses" is NOT scriptural!
by Nathan Natas init is not infrequently that jehovah's witnesses make the statement that the name of their organization is "scriptural.
tony wills, in his book "a people for his name" makes an interesting point about the misrepresentation of that name as "scriptural" and the appropriateness of this name-change by the impostor "bible scholar" rutherford -.
[rutherford] showed the need of a new name by such texts as the following:.
-
24
Attention lurkers! Come on in, the water's fine!
by Mickey mouse ini have been here for almost six months now and thought i would mark the occasion by starting one of these threads.
you may have been lurking on this site for a while, learning a lot but too afraid to participate.
i was convinced that somehow my ip address would be traced or i would be i.d'ed.
-
9
Blondie and/or anyone else who's able to help.....
by lavendar inin the 1970 edition of the new world translation in hebrews 1:6, it says, "and let all god's angels worship him.
" but the newer 1980 version of the nwt changed that to "and let all god's angels do obeisance to him.".
are there any other passages of scripture that the wts has changed from the older nwt version (to fit their doctrine)??
-
31
DC 2008 Releases
by JWFreak injust to update you all on the this summers releases from a very good friend / source .
totally confirmed .
i just love to annoy the borg......and no i am no longer a witness .
-
4
Countdown to the season
by sass_my_frass inonly a month before the snow season starts here.
i had a few trips planned but they're now on hold pending how well my sister copes with her chemo.
not that we live within a few hours flight of each other, or that she even lets me speak to her.