by BizzyBee 246 Replies latest members politics
Ed Koch, a former mayor of New York, one of those people in power, is calling for it.
Are you serious? Ed Koch?
This Ed Koch?
He hasn't been a force in politics since around 1988 - 25 years. What power does he have?
The point is that no one in any position of power (POTUS, VPOTUS, members of congress) is calling for a ban on all guns.
The point is that Beks got what she asked for and now you are scambling to find a way to say it's not true. It is true, like it or not.
As I said, create a defensible argurment and then argue it, rather than try to minimize or dismiss facts that your side said didn't exist.
Oh, and since you apparently are unaware, Ed Koch is still in politics.
Ed Koch's participation in politics consists of endorsing candidates. He has no power to influence federal or state legislation.
You're reaching.
Your claim is that there is a "call to ban guns." My claim is that there are no legislators who are calling for such.
If you want to cite the entire blogosphere, I'm sure you will find support for any extreme position you choose. That is not a worthy debate, in my view.
I am not reaching at all. I simply provided evidence for what was said to not exist, people calling for a ban on all guns.
If you want to talk specifically about legislators, then sure, we can, but it's not honest to pretend that is what the original claim was about.
people calling for a ban on all guns.
That is a pointless argument - "people" on the internet say anything and everything. I can't believe you find anonymous internet assertions worth debating. I don't.
If Ed Koch (!) is the most credible reference point for your claim - then I declare victory and say good-night.
Nut + Gun = Dead Mom, Now let's talk precision
Was the gun he shot his mom wit' secured ???? obviously not
if it had been ,she and others could still be alive
You still don't know if they were secured or not. You are still speaking from ignorance._______EP
Hello EP, when security is breeched, it's not secure.
Nut + found key + Got gun + shot mom + went on rampage = Guns not secure enough
EP, It's not rocket science. Ask the survivors and they will tell you that those guns
were'nt secure
.
Hello EP, when security is breeched, it's not secure.
A ridiculous statement. Using your definition, nothing is secure. Try again.
That is a pointless argument - "people" on the internet say anything and everything. I can't believe you find anonymous internet assertions worth debating. I don't.
I know. Like when you declared victory and ran away. There's no point in debating that worthless anonymous internet assertion.
Ok EP have it your way
I think Most people understand that if the mom " so call " secured the guns
and the " so called " security could be breeched , Means the guns were not secured.
I think you understand also. It's jus' a matter of havin' the last word
And you are more than welcome to have " The last word "
even when you don't make sense.
.
I think you understand also. It's jus' a matter of havin' the last word. And you are more than welcome to have " The last word " even when you don't make sense.
I know, because you seem to think "secured" means "unbreachable".
It doesn't.
/si'kyo?or/
Adjective
| ||||
Verb
| ||||
Synonyms
|
