My position isn't one of insensitivity toward anyone that claims they were abused, but how it gets back to Jehovah's Witnesses as an organization that acts as a protective agent toward child neglect, abuse. The “good of the Universal Church had to be considered in the final decision" as an official statement has been repeated by clergy up to and including the Pope, but this rhetoric has only been picked up and applied to Jehovah's Witnesses by ex-JWs. Mischievous persons have wedged their way into many profit and non-profit organizations and stirred up trouble. This information here is in compliance with RAINN:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandated_reporter
In many U.S. states and Australia, mandated reporters are professionals who, in the ordinary course of their work and because they have regular contact with children, disabled persons, senior citizens, or other identified vulnerable populations, are required to report (or cause a report to be made) whenever financial, physical, sexual or other types of abuse has been observed or is suspected, or when there is evidence of neglect, knowledge of an incident, or an imminent risk of serious harm. For example, in South Australia, a school teacher must report a child attending school seeming malnourished or presenting with bruising, complaining of neglect or otherwise demonstrating neglect or abuse at home, to child welfare authorities.
These professionals can be held liable by both the civil and criminal legal systems for intentionally failing to make a report but their name can also be said unidentified. Mandated reporters also include persons who have assumed full or intermittent responsibility for the care or custody of a child, dependent adult, or elder, whether or not they are compensated for their services. RAINN maintains a database of mandatory reporting regulations regarding children and the elderly by state, including who is required to report, standards of knowledge, definitions of a victim, to whom the report must be made, information required in the report, and regulations regarding timing and other procedures at http://www.rainn.org/public-policy/legal-resources/mandatory-reporting-database/
Abuse occurs where a victim has suffered physical injury inflicted other than by accidental means, has injuries, or is in a condition resulting from mistreatment, such as malnutrition, sexual molestation or exploitation, deprivation of necessities, emotional abuse or cruelty.
Neglect may be defined as abandonment, denial of proper care and attention physically, emotionally, or morally, or living under conditions, circumstances or associations injurious to well-being.
Typically, minimum requirements for what must be reported include:
- A description of how the reporter learned of the injuries or neglect and of any actions taken to assist
- Information on previous injuries, assaults, neglect or financial abuses
- The date, time, nature, and extent of the abuse or neglect
- The date of the report
- The perpetrator's name, address, and relationship to the (possible) victim
- The reporter's name, agency, position, address, telephone number, and signature
Law enforcement or public health agencies are responsible for immediately evaluating and classifying all reports of suspected abuse, neglect, or imminent risk. When reports contain sufficient information to warrant an investigation, authorities must make efforts within a reasonable time frame to begin an effective investigation, often within hours, particularly when there is an imminent risk of physical harm or another emergency; investigations must also be completed within a reasonable or specified time frame. The investigation also must also include a determination of whether the report was actually warranted or if it was unfounded.
There have been media outlets that have interviewed individuals that have told stories and no qualifying evidence was presented that would lead to an alleged perpetrator being charged with a crime, let alone a successful conviction. The only item of interest that made these
stories "news worthy" was a " veiled threat of being excommunicated." If a person makes criminal accusations to anyone in a position of authority, they will explain “you need to be careful who you speak to about this sort of thing” if they choose not to act as a communication medium between the accuser and authorities. For future reference, I guess the elders should hand a copy of the
official policy to the accuser so there are no communication problems as it provides instructions: " Additionally, the victim or anyone else who has knowledge of the allegation may wish to report the matter to the authorities, and it is his or her absolute right to do so." For incidents that slip through the cracks like what I stated about my father, it doesn't get back to Jehovah's Witnesses as an organization.