Do we have "Free Will" or is it an illusion?

by Rod P 134 Replies latest members private

  • Rod P
    Rod P

    Narkissos,

    By "should" and "should not" I mean that if the Reality is, we do not have "free will", then the notion of setting up the "game" with reward and punishment is simply superfluous. (Yet, I still accept the fact that these operands are embedded in the "game".)

    siegswife,

    I do not see an alternative to being "me". I know that I am me, and I accept that. I also know that you are you, and I accept that.

    This, however, does not detract from the issue, the question: "Does what is ME have "free will" or not? Same for you!

    You say that you are free to choose to be you. I would say you do not have a choice in the matter, because you can only be you. How is that being "free"?

    You talk about "learning from your choices" and "mature to being the best me I can be." But if the "choices" you make are pre-determined by your nature, personality, biology, culture, etc. then I put it to you that you are NOT really making "free choices". This also calls into question whether you are really "learning" anything. You are merely "unfolding" to become what you already are. Like the caterpillar who turns into the butterfly, it is inevitable and built-in. You do not become the "best ME I can be". You are simply inevitably manifesting what you already are; it's just that it takes time to come out for all to see, including yourself (self-discovery?????)

    How, then does "I can" imply you have "freedom of choice"?

    zen nudist,

    Of course we are players in the game, ...active participants out for our own benefit. I would argue that if there is no "free will", that we are "out for our own benefit" by nature, and hence, no choice but to do so.

    You say that we are "relatively free to act in our own best interests." But the only "freedom" we have here is that Society allows you the external freedom to do so. This, however, does not imply that internally you are "freely choosing" what may be in your best interest. The decision-making part of you has already been moulded into what it is, that gives it the pre-disposition to choose what it does. That is the Illusion here. You only think you are "free" because no-one outside your being is forcing you to choose one way or the other. But inside yourself, you cannot help how you choose because you are the essence that you are. Too bad, so sad, but that's the way it is.

    You say "....we are also able to punish others who violate our goals". But if "free will" is an illusion, then the punishment we inflict on others is merely our inevitable reaction to someone else's inevitable actions against us.

    You mentioned "goals". If there is no "free will" then we are fooling ourselves into thinking we can have them. Goals are plans to reach something we are striving towards at some future date. But every action-reaction, planning and thought process is merely a mechanical, deterministic function of our pre-determined "self". We are not really "going" anywhere, and neither are we "arriving" at some kind of destination. In short, goals are "illusory" and the products of our own imaginations.

    You say "the only reason we ever act is because of "discontent or dissatisfaction". I would argue that this is an inevitable mental state, in reaction to some situation we are in, or that we empathetically relate to with another person in their circumstances.

    You say that "others....are often in our thoughts, and their well-being is part of our well-being". I would say that we live "in our thoughts", which is our brain talking to ourself, weighing pros and cons, making decisions, triggering emotions- using words or vocabulary which are symbols of "meaning" we have attached to them. All of this has been inculcated into us by what we call "education" or "learning". But to maintain there is no "free will" is to imply that all of these processes and accumulations in a "cause and effect" universe is simply a mechanistic flow from Point "A" to Point "B" to Point "C", etc. At each minute step of the way, this is deterministically cumulative, so that the outcomes are inevitable. No responsibility can be assigned.

    Why should we "care" about anything in a pre-determined universe? Besides, even the "Caring" would also be inevitable, because what we are, decides whether we care or not!

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    I am telling you all, that we HAVE TO HAVE FREE WILL, or all is pointless and meaningless, and without choice or responsibility, or right or wrong or morality, and reward and punishment is redundant. No "free will" is insanity! IMHO It's just that I am having one heck of a time finding out How or at what level we do, in fact, have "free will".

    Rod P.

  • OldSoul
    OldSoul
    Rod P: I am telling you all, that we HAVE TO HAVE FREE WILL, or all is pointless and meaningless, and without choice or responsibility, or right or wrong or morality, and reward and punishment is redundant. No "free will" is insanity! IMHO It's just that I am having one heck of a time finding out How or at what level we do, in fact, have "free will".

    You're only saying that because you have to.

    Seriously, I agree completely. A world without free will, a human existence without the capacity to make deliberate choice contrary to inclination and influence, is ultimately the epitomy of a futile existence.

    And that would be the greatest joke ever played by evolution, bringing forth a species capable of comprehending the utter and inescapable depth of its own futility. In the long run, nothing anyone did would matter so there would be no standard against which to determine morality or what really constitutes harm.

  • OldSoul
    OldSoul

    {How'd that happen? A first for me ...}

  • siegswife
    siegswife

    Rod, What I'm saying is that we cannot have free will if we don't have that which you seem to feel prevents us from having it.

    How can "I" have free will without a defined "me"?

    Lea

  • OldSoul
    OldSoul

    siegswife,

    Much that exists cannot be defined. That doesn't mean it isn't real. Look how long man used fire before they knew what "fire" was.

    Respectfully,
    OldSoul

  • siegswife
    siegswife

    I don't think that is addressing what I mean. Fire existed and had definition even if people didn't know what it was. What you're saying sounds like fire had to be defined in language in order for it to exist. I'm not talking about defining words.

    If I am not bound by my identity and the uniqueness of myself than I cannot have or not have anything. It wouldn't matter if I had free will or not because I wouldn't exist.

    How can free will exist outside the realm of having a personal identity?

    Lea

  • OldSoul
    OldSoul

    Lea,

    We know some of the things that make one individual unique from others, but we do not know enough to provide more than a very broad definition of ourselves. Every attempt is inadequate. I'm just saying you don't have to have a conscious definition for something in order for it to exist. I am saying fire existed long before it could be defined. Just like free will can exist without a definition of "me". I exist, without a definition for "me". Just as fire existed before it was defined.

    Free will is a concept, it isn't a thing. You could just as well ask, "How can 'up' exist, or how can there be less than nothing of something (negative integers)?"

    Respectfully,
    OldSoul

  • trevor
    trevor
    How can free will exist outside the realm of having a personal identity?

    It is only outside of our personal identity that free will truly exists. Otherwise we are limited and bound by our illusionary concept of ourselves.

    This takes us into metaphysical realms and has been referred to as the death of the ego, re-birth transformation and so on.

  • siegswife
    siegswife

    Maybe I'm just thick but how can the concept or the reality of "will" exist without an "I"?

    Who's "will" is free if there that which makes the person doesn't fit into the equation? How can you have will without a force behind the will?

    Lea

  • trevor
    trevor

    Siegswife

    That which you think is you is not your true reality. Through meditation it is possible to empty yourself of all the accumulation of debris that is mistaken for the true I, and to see beyond your present identity. The next stage is to realize that that which you have thought to be an individual I, is really part of something vast which is not separate from you nor you from it.

    OSHO explains it better:

    When you have emptied all the content, thoughts, desires, memories, projections, hopes, when all is gone, for the first time you find yourself, because you are nothing but that pure space, that virgin space within you.
    Unburdened by anything, that content-less consciousness, that is what you are! Seeing it, realizing it, one is free. One is freedom, one is joy, one is bliss.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit