yk-
okay, back again....and i see youve left nothing of substance since yesterday, color me surprised.
No, that doesn't explain why he made such statements.
when did i say i was trying to "explain why he made such statements"? i was merely giving
my reason for posting them, which is to show what your hero is all about. i have no idea why he made such statements.......im guessing it has to do with a lack of sanity though.
Cutting and pasting out of context quotes is intended to prejudice people and cause them to form an opinion based upon disjointed thoughts.
kind of like what you do, hey? no, actually its
exactly what you do....and if youd like examples, id be happy to oblige. your quote at the beginning of this thread is one prime example of this, and the government report you quoted awhile back was the same story.....out of context and intended to prejudice people towards and cause them to form an opinion based upon disjointed thoughts. you did provide links though, so that anyone who wanted to read the quotes in their entirety could do so, right? well, i also provided the specific article that each larouche quote came from (save a couple, which i will provide upon request), so that anyone who wishes can look up the articles themselves. again, as ive said before, the reader can be the judge of his sanity.
What you have demonstrated is that you are intellectually dishonest and lazy.
ill have to remember that quote the next time i see you pick one sentence out of a posters thought, and them slam them for it.......or the next time you pick and choose which part of a buffet quote to use to your benefit, rather than posting the entire quote......you too must be "intellectually dishonest and lazy" according to these standards.
You poor guy. LOL That's what I have consistently pointed out that you are immersed in a cartoon fantasy land and have become so disoriented that can't distinguish fact from fiction.
you are proving my points for me as we go along, and i appreciate it. only a lunatic (or "crackpot") would think that just becuase someone enjoys watching a fictional movie, or reading a fictional book that they are "immersed in a cartoon fantasy land....". you really have lost it, and you continue to show as much with your out-of-left-field comments such as this one. my comment was "americans love good fiction"......so what? most witnesses i know love good fiction too......are they all "immersed in a cartoon fantasy land" as well? your arguments are nonsensical, and ill continue to point this out as long as you keep supplying this lunacy in your sad attempts to discredit me.
I merely took what you said. You said that the White House was behind 9-11. If that's not what you menat to say then that's fine, you are allowed to make a correction or retraction, but don't try to sleaze your way out of making blantantly stupid comments just because I nailed you.
what is it you imagine you "nailed" me with? lol, are your delusions taking over again? so i generalized our government with the words "white house"....big deal. did you think i actually meant that he was saying each member of the white house staff knew of the attacks beforehand? surely you are not that dense man. im not trying to sleaze my way out of anything, and i dont see how this is some "blantantly stupid comment". its a generalization, people use them all the time. it is obvious you are growing increasingly desperate in this losing battle of yours. perhaps i just hit too many nerves with all my exposing of your heros "sanity"........its understandable that you must resort back to personal attacks to divert the attention.
I understand LaRouche's thinking and why he makes certain statments because I understand where he's coming from historically. If you want to pick any particular quote I will try and explain it to you.
i didnt ask you to explain his quotes....i think his quotes need no explanation, LOL. i asked you to
defend their sanity, which is an impossibility. the man has obviously lost it, regardless of what context you put those quotes in. the meaning behind them wont change a bit, and anyone who wants to read the entire article to see this can surely do so (as i said before).......guess what though? they wont sound any more sane in the article than they do alone. why not? because you cant make lunacy sound reasonable.
I know deep down you are very weak and fearful of things you don't understand.
yes yk, youve got me pegged......im posting on this thread because im so scared of larouche and his maniacal writings. after all, he is "the most dangerous man in the world right now", LMAO. who is it that is immersed in fantasy?
That's why you try and take comfort in cartoons and such.
another reference back to spiderman? pathetic attacks man, give it up.
The facts are that the media lied and LaRouche was right.
you act as if the man has a perfect track record. first of all, larouche didnt predict enron, and i challenge you to paste the article when he did(if so, he couldve surely shorted the stock making millions). secondly, i understand it is a fact that many insane people are actually very intelligent in some areas.....they are just disconnected from reality (thus all the conspiracy theories he spins). he has spoken out about derivatives, and enrons collapse was partially due to derivatives......does this mean the rest of his lunatic ravings will come to pass as well? lol, surely even you do not think so, unless you believe we are in danger of being taken over by moscow shortly after aids wipes out our defenses. watch out for hovering black helicopters........
It proves to honest readers that apostate ridiculers will say anything to keep from facing the cold hard truth outside of La-La Land. / You know
what cold hard truth? what facts have you provided? i asked you to show me where ive ever denied
facts as you specifically claimed i did, can you do so? if you cannot, than honest readers can simply see that you are a liar.
oh, and my prediction came true:
prediction: 0-3. (of course they will all be discounted as "nonsense", "absurd", "not worth your time", etc, or simply ignored as usual.)
they were ignored........i guess that makes my track record of predictions 1-0......whats your record btw, just to remind the "honest readers"?
aa
