FINALLY! Can you prove God exists? If you can I won't ask again!

by punkofnice 544 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

• 

  unstopableravens

  cofty : i rewrote it bud sorry
• 

  unstopableravens

  thanks mrs jones, as you can see my grammer sucks, im pretty good at math, but that doesn't help here.
• 

  cofty

  Ok thanks - Here is the difference..

  Scientist know some things for a certainty - evolution for example.

  Other things they humbly admit they don't know yet but they have some hypothesis they are working on - what was before the big bang for example.

  You have admitted knowing nothing at all about evolution but you have decided you don't believe it anyway.
• 

  unstopableravens

  i did not say i know nothing i said i have not read a book since high school.im not a blind follower bro.
• 

  mrsjones5

  Any book or a book on evolution? And how long ago was high school?
• 

  unstopableravens

  mrs jones lol on evolution , i grad in 2002 .
• 

  cofty

  unstop - I studied Latin in High School. I don't remember a single thing about it.

  Science is really complex. If you are seriously interested in understanding evolution you are going to have to make an effort.
• 

  mrsjones5

  Got it.
• 

  Pterist

  A skeptic or atheist is governed by two main principles: 1) all beliefs must be supported by observational evidence , and 2) beliefs that contradict observational evidence cannot be tolerated. However, strong atheism states that there is no god, even though observational evidence indicates that the universe has a cause that cannot be detected observationally. So despite the lack of observational evidence for a naturalistic cause for the universe, the strong atheist believes that the universe has a naturalistic cause and that there is no god, contradicting the tenet that all beliefs should be based upon observational evidence .
  So essentially, their entire atheist doctrine is steeped in the fact that one cannot prove God...yet, they are unable to prove there is no God. So a Christian is labeled an 'ignorant believer', while the accuser is so much more ignorant they fail to realize that their atheism is also steeped in an non-provable belief, that in turn makes them EXACTLY the same as the person they point a finger at. It is like "heads" calling "tails" wrong...without recognizing they are 2 sides of the same coin!
• 

  jgnat

  [edited because I can] A skeptic or atheist is governed by two main principles: 1) all beliefs must be supported by observational evidence , and 2) beliefs that contradict observational evidence cannot be tolerated. However, strong atheism states that there is no god, even though observational evidence indicates that the universe has a cause[start] that cannot be detected observationally. So despite the lack of observational evidence for a naturalistic cause for the universe, the strong atheist believes that the universe has a naturalistic cause and that there is no god, contradicting the tenet that all beliefs should be based upon observational evidence . [based on occam's razor. The simplest explanation is most likely true. All can be explained without the existence of God.]
  So essentially, their entire atheist doctrine...[principles]...