I did check the verses and they were of course familiar.
I was asking you to explore a bit. I know you don't have all the answers but that doesn't mean you can't push the boundaries of what you can know.
It has been asserted that the resurrected Jesus ate food. So a glorified body has a digestive system including an anus so they can defecate and they would need to fart and pee.
But you have also asserted that the resurrected Jesus has no blood which makes all of that impossible.
It means he does not need a heart or lungs or an anus or a penis and yet you insist he is a man.
The problem is you believers want to make bold assertions but when somebody asks you to look at the implications of your assertions you want to retreat back to the safety of mysteries. Sometimes like Pterist you want to mix that up with a bit of pseudoscience to make it sound more credible. Pterist even reverted to the christian persecution complex by falsely claiming I was making personal attacks - a claim he will neither support nor apologise for.
Does this sort of behaviour remind you of anything? How did we respond as JWs when people asked a few logical questions about the "paradise" and living forever?