Topics Started by avengers

41
1914 BREATHTAKING BLASPHEME
by DannyHaszard in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
articulator manipulator

the "truth" is worth lying for

breathtaking blaspheme!
455
In the spirit of match-making, who do you have a crush on?
by MsMcDucket in
1. social
2. relationships
eh heh?

i know this is either going to be one of those topics where people consider it a popularity contest or something....i'm just being an imp and seeing if anyone will be forward enough to tell about the person that they would like to date.. me, i'm married so that leaves me out!

but i have seen a lot of beefcakes on here!
25
Time is their enemy
by LDH in
1. jw
2. friends
tick, tick, tick.. the governing body is dying one by one, faster now.. young people who thought they would never see themselves getting old now take meds for cholesterol, alzheimers, diabetes, blood pressure.. the end isn't here.. tick, tick, tick.. kids who walked away from the wt after being warned that they would die like a dog in the streets instead are very successful young people with real jobs, families, and assets.. empty threats stop having an effect.

apathy sets in.

automatons attend the meetings.
55
DC, all but gave directions to the JWD site
by ocsrf in
1. jw
2. friends
.

i found the dc very interesting this year do to my reading of this site.

i took note that the danger of the internet was menitioned no less than three times, once with a demonstration showing a brother who found a site by a innocent search of the web on a jw subject to the very last talk, concluding remarks and final "resolution" that consisted of 10 items with number 10 staying away from dangerous sites and chat rooms.. makes you wonder what the real story is behind that much attention being given to this problem iof theirs.. oc
87
Napa Valley, CA Child Abuse Court Case Victories
by AndersonsInfo in
1. watchtower
2. child-abuse
napa wt child abuse case.

two important court decisions, which came out of napa valley, ca, are now available for us to post on jwd.

these significant rulings overturn objections regularly made by the watchtower in recent lawsuits and may serve as a precedent for future lawsuits.
27
Witnesses cannot refute the real "TRUTH"
by integ in
1. jw
2. friends
no matter what any pompass ass witness says about the religion being the "truth", they cannot refute the simple fact that nothing they have ever predicted has come true.

that's a pretty poor record for gods' chosen people.

oh sure they can point to lame obvious things such as " critical times getting harder to deal with" (even that is debatable), but no hard facts to point to that show they are right, or have ever been.
18
onacruse's (Craig's) Story of his life
by Rescripting_myself in
1. jw
2. friends
what became of craig's story of his life after he submitted it's 17th episode on nov 5, 2005?

that's the last episode i find of it.

anybody who can enlighten me of what happened after that?
587
Show us your picture
by Honesty in
1. jw
2. friends
.

that is, if you are able to without the prospect of facing a three-man kangaroo court appointed by jerhover to keep the congregation clean from apostate influences.. i'll go first: .
15
watchtower.org Does Damage Control On Secret Societies
by Rig Boy in
1. watchtower
2. bible
watchtower.org, the official website of the jdubs currently has a piece that brushes on the "dangers" of secret societies.

the writers are careful not to mention freemasons/zionists/jesuits etc.... yeah wouldn't want people investigating that.

more interestingly, everytime a masonic piece or other type of scandalous piece is posted on jwd, the watchtower seems to put up a damage control/rebuttal article out to deny the allegations.
1093
THE NEWS IS BIGGER THAN DATELINE, BBC, CBC, ETC.
by AndersonsInfo in
1. watchtower
2. scandals
if i told you that something bigger is on the horizon than dateline, bbc, cbc, sunday (australia), and all other tv programs which exposed the sexual child abuse cover-up by watchtower in 2002-2003, would you believe me?

have i ever misled you?

i'll answer that--no!