Hecce, again, im no fan of cedars, but where did the underage part come from? Hes admitting sexting as a married man, not saying its cool, but hes not admitting anything else. Its a stretch to get to underage girls simply because he didnt specify the ages of the women he was talking to. Without a reason to believe they were underage its a low blow.
Charging $150 To Tell Your Stories
What's regressive supposed to mean!
Morpheus 2 hours ago
Hecce, again, im no fan of cedars, but where did the underage part come from?
I already said that I have my reasons for asking the question, if there is nothing there fine but I know that this has been discussed before and if someone remembers something I will like to have the answer.
I am not accusing him of anything and I am going by what he said when he admitted having cybersex with girls, not women as you are saying.
Interesting that he said “girls” and yet described himself as a married “man”. That said, its not an admission of anything. Lots of men refer to women as “girls” or “gals” , be it for sexist reasons or taught habbit or whatever.. its a heavy charge and without some evidance, an accuser or an admission there no reason to make that leap
in the end i dont remember anything on the topic of cedars and young girls so i cannot offer anything specific, hecce. Did you use the forum search?
Will do that
I wouldn’t bother asking him, it’s not too pleasant a question and should he be guilty of such, you think he is just going to tell you the truth? With that said, to get my jollies I asked him a similar question on YouTube. I got a quick response that accused me of being “obsessed with my penis”.
Not trying to be mean, but Lloyd has a certain “look” about him. Eager to clear my intentions with him, I started thus: “Lloyd I am most certainly not obsessed with your penis”. But I fell for this cruel folly and had a bit of a vomit reflex when I realised that I had used “Lloyd” and “penis” in the same sentence. Needless to say I let it go and let him have the last word, which is what he wanted anyhow.
Remember when Cedars wrote an open letter to the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses offering advice on reforming the religion?
In hindsight, I think it was just envy for their ability to fleece the flock.
Londo111, you call comments about Cedars and underage cyber sex "a scurrilous accusation."
I wholeheartedly disagree with you. Here's why:
Any named author who confesses in his publically available book to having cyber sex "with girls" is mischievously asking to be misconstrued - especially in light of valid widespread concerns about child pornography.
Surely to goodness, if an author feels constrained to disclose this kind of information, he needs to be absolutely scrupulously clear to remove all doubt whether a crime was committed (under relevant laws on child pornography).
I'll like to give him the benefit of the doubt that it was not with underage girls - but until he clarifies that very crucial detail, I won't.
I figured out what bothers me the most about this: it plays right into the Watchtower's narrative about "apostates" We're all greedy and out to attract followers to ourselves so we can take their money. We don't need to give them ammunition to use against us.
I think "girls" means women in everyday usage, in this sort of context, unless good reason to think otherwise. He would have been wise to anticipate misconstrual and be more precise in his wording.
Who is the guy in Croatia that Bo Juel talked about meeting up with in the video? Mark or something. Seems there is a back story not made explicit.