Jehovah's Witness Discussion Forum | JW.Org Community Information
The biggest, busiest JW community & support discussion forum for Jehovah's Witnesses, those interested in JW.Org beliefs or the Watchtower Bible & Tract Society
-
7
JW will have their own "Night Show" if you will. Be we apostates have another thought all together
by LevelThePlayingField innice 3 minute video - wait for it.... https://youtu.be/idbzzfs9a0y.
-
1
US Treasury Dept to accuse Vietnam of manipulating its Dong.
by JeffT inyes, that is what it says.
.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-09/us-treasury-expands-currency-probe-may-name-vietnam-dong-manipulator.
-
38
What is the current policy on blood?
by stillin inhas there been anything recent?
the last i knew, certain fractions were considered a conscience matter.
blood derived vaccinations were cleared, saying that the blood part has been removed.
-
24
“Bablyon the Great has Fallen”
by lastmanstanding inwhat have you not heard lately?.
.... no discussion on “babylon’s fall”.
by 1919 it was apparent that jehovah had passed judgment on christendom—and indeed on all false religion.
-
62
2019 BOE Elders letter May 13 England - Ireland Data Protection
by Not_Culty inhttps://tinyurl.com/y2bzncu9.
-
26
How to explain the Overlapping Generations Doctrine
by HiddenPimo inso after much research i came to the following conclusion:.
.
-
11
JW'S IN THE FRYING PAN AGAIN !
by ZindagiNaMilegiDobaara inhttps://www.zambiawatchdog.com/people-who-dont-sing-national-anthem-to-be-arrested/.
zing.
-
19
May 2019 Broadcast
by BourneIdentity ini know i already created a post about this a week or so ago, but i have a little more to add to it.
i was watching it again and taking some notes this time.
the speaker lists these reasons for people having anxieties:.
-
58
Do You Support a Sex Strike?
by minimus inalyssa milano is saying that women have to go on a sex strike to take control of their bodies.
what do you think about this?.
-
45
New Light on the 144,000?
by Ding insomeone on facebook is claiming to have reliable information that the gb is about to announce new light on the 144,000 -- that it's symbolic, not literal.. one person suggested that they will retain the two-class teaching and just change the meaning of 144,000. his idea was that the change would avoid three problems with the current teaching:.
1. embarrassment over more and more partakers at the memorial when the number should be getting less and less.. 2. embarrassment over 12 symbolic 12,000s somehow equaling a literal 144,000.. 3. solving the problem of running out of "anointed" ones who are old enough to be on the gb.. thoughts?.