The decision should be based on whether tie vaccination is effective, the chances of coming down with something without it is significant, and the condition that it supposedly immunizes against is serious. And, how dangerous the vaccination itself is. If you are vaccinating against something that has barely an increased risk for problems later, and the vaccine is dangerous, then no, you shouldn't get it.
Whether it is a sexually transmitted disease is besides the point. If it is a mild disease and the risks of later complications is low, and the vaccine itself causes autism and other serious problems, that is a bigger reason to not get it than because it is against a sexually transmitted disease. On the other hand, if you have a vaccine that is about as dangerous as an aspirin, is highly effective, and the risk of not taking the vaccine is getting something that causes 20 years of suffering, then by all means take it.
Seems the Filthful and Disgraceful Slavebugger knows nothing about medicine, and should stay out of it (even worse than Fauci, who I do not respect). Bad enough Gates and Fauci trying to get these shots out. But, when a religion that knows absolutely nothing about disease tries telling people to trust in joke-hova, and later expecting them to take some (Coronavirus) shots but not others (HPV), and puts your salvation on the line, that is going too far.
I also recall a time when they were totally against all vaccinations, and not because they do not work, are dangerous, or are a scam. Because they wanted people to trust in joke-hova, that's why. Now, we have so many shots for stupid things along with legitimate shots, that one should make your own decision on a per-shot basis. Not based on what some idiots say based on a book full of lies, but based on doing your own research on the risks and benefits of shots (and versus taking vitamin D).