uninformed

Joined

• started 12 topics
• posted 1,069 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by uninformed

• 
  26

  Punishing GB members, COs and elders

  by greendawn in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  how do you think the gb members along with the cos and elders should be punished for the way they emotionally and spiritually abuse and hurt the flocks of the naive r&f?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uninformed

  Punishment:

  An old friend of mine always wanted to make it into the New World.

  He also always wanted to water ski behind a boat load of CO's paddling as fast as they could.

  Brant
• 
  4

  Perryville, Arkansas

  by rekless in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  any arkansasians here?

  if you live near perryville pm me.

  thanks

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uninformed

  Rekless and Fats,

  I have a sister in Gravette. Visit there frequently. Is perryville close?

  Rekless, did you happen know the 'Careys' in or near the Shasta area?

  Brant
• 
  7

  Mid MO anyone??

  by crazyblondeb in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  we are trying to put a mini-fest, actually just a get-together for late this month.

  so for anyone going to be in the mid-mo area, let me know.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uninformed

  My wife and I and son and his wife are in the KC, KS area.

  Would consider attending.

  When and where?

  Brant
• 
  44

  Another lawsuit... this one in Oregon.

  by Elsewhere in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  complaint: negligence, breach of confidential relationship, intentional infliction of severe emotional distress.

  once again the elders appointed a convicted and confessed child molester to a position of responsibility as an officer and ministerial servant of the congregation.

  this time the accused name is jerry anderson crabb of the lancaster congregation of jehovah's witnesses - 4795 macleay road se, salem, or 97301. sadly, as one would expect, he has been accused of sexually abusing a child on multiple occasions.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uninformed

  Elsewhere,

  Good Job!

  Brant
• 
  37

  FROM the source about downsizing

  by Pistoff in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  i toured wallkill in the last month; the tour guide stated, in very clear terms, that the wt leadership is "sending home" many older couples and older ones, and replacing them with younger ones as they need to.

  he did say it was because their experience was of more use in the field.

  (snicker.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uninformed

  I wonder if the GB have not read the new LIVE WITH JEHOVAH'S DAY IN MIND book?

  Page 72 subheading ' Justice in business and in money matters'

  Paragraph 10 :

  'If you own a business with employees - or even if you just hire someone to do a job - how do your wages, requests, and monetary dealing measure up in the light of Malachi 3:5? It is good to think about this because the issue of not treating hired workers justly is considered in the Christian Greek Scriptures too. Concerning those dealing unjustly in such matter, the disciple James asked: 'Is he (Jehovah) not opposing you?' James 5:1. We are correct to conclude:Those who are unjust as to the 'wages of a wage worker' have not really come to know Jehovah, for they are not imitating his justice.'

  I wonder what those who have been given the boot from Brooklyn will think?

  Gill--------

  Sometimes when I come to this DB I read things like you wrote above and just friggin' marvel at how tuned in and smart some of you guys are.

  You really laid it on the table.

  Brant
• 
  36

  X - JW or Apostate?

  by In Between in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i thought this might be interesting.

  if it's been talked about before, i apologize in advance.

  what differences do you think exist between the two?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uninformed

  Auld Soul, what did you mean, ex-ex JW?

  Sounds like reactiviation?

  Uninformed

  I think anyone who leaves any religion or belief system or former loyalty is an apostate, whether or not they ever adopt another one or speak out against the former one. It is not really a scary word.

  Every single JW that used to be a different religion or married to a different person or a subscriber to certain magazine is an apostate. Okay, maybe the magazine subscription is a stretch . I used to be a JW, so I am an apostate. JWs view the word with some sort of paranormal superstition that the word simply does not denote or connote. Every ex-JW is an apostate. Only the JW usage of the word would carry some connotation of vengeance against the formerly held loyalty.

  I am definitely an ex-JW and I am working toward becoming an EX-ex-JW. But if I can help hit the reset button that will free my wife and family to choose again on my way toward that goal, so much the better.

  Respectfully,
  
  AuldSoul
• 
  44

  The WBTS: Accomplices To Its Own Demise

  by AMNESIAN in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  excerpt #1 .

  excerpt #2: (semi-verbatim, highly-reliable paraphrase)

  but whats coming out of their mouths is still from jehovahs table, its still food we need.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uninformed

  Amnesian,

  Thank you for the report. It sickens me too to see the leaders treated like gods and pampered and wined and dined.

  The whole thing is a sham. I noticed in your report of his talk he didn't mention Jesus much.

  Again, thanks

  Brant
• 
  36

  Update! Attending Sunday Meeting and Loving it!

  by drew sagan in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  yep that's right folks, yours truely has actually been attending the sunday meeting.

  many will ask, why in the hell would you ever do that?

  well, developments going on in my world have led me to this decision.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uninformed

  Drew,

  I admire you (and your wife) for going for the reasons you are and especially admire you for talking about Jesus in a place that they have retired Jesus for the Faithful and Discreet Slave.

  Good Show!

  Brant
• 
  27

  Witnesses cannot refute the real "TRUTH"

  by integ in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  no matter what any pompass ass witness says about the religion being the "truth", they cannot refute the simple fact that nothing they have ever predicted has come true.

  that's a pretty poor record for gods' chosen people.

  oh sure they can point to lame obvious things such as " critical times getting harder to deal with" (even that is debatable), but no hard facts to point to that show they are right, or have ever been.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uninformed

  Blondie,

  I'll be damned.

  the one thing I thought they got right!!!!

  Plagerism. (assholes)

  Brant
• 
  51

  I'm going back to the JW's

  by Honesty in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  if you can acccurately disprove the mathematics in the following i will be at the local kingdom hall first thing in the morning and ask the elders if i may rejoin them in worship.. here is some information i have compiled regarding what the watchtower has printed in regards to the babylonian kings and how the lengths of their reigns can be calculated to arrive at the date of the destruction of jerusalem by nebuchadnezzar.

  if you're like me you've probably remained totally clueless whenever the subject of the chronology leading to back 607 b.c.

  as the date for the destruction of jerusalem by nebuchadnezzar comes up.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uninformed

  Let's summarize (remember we have to go backwards starting in 539 B.C. with Nabonidus):

  Nabonidus ruled Babylon until it fell in 539 B.C. to Cyrus.

  Labashi-Marduk ruled for 9 months.

  Neriglissar ruled for 4 years.

  Evil-Merodach ruled for 2 years.

  Nebuchadnezzer ruled for 43 years.

  17 years + 9 months + 4 years + 2 years + 43 years = 66 to 67 years.

  Starting at 539 B.C. and going back 66/67 years we arrive at 605/606 B.C. for the start of the reign of Nebuchadnezzer.

  2nd Kings 25:8-10 tells us that Jerusalem was destroyed in the 19th year of Nebuchadnezzer's reign, so if we go forward 19 years from 605/606 B.C. we will have the approximate years of the destruction of Jerusalem.

  Nineteen years after 605/606 B.C. brings us to 586/587 B.C. which agrees with all secular evidence.

  That's easy!

  1+2=4

  Why can't you postates see that?

  U