by ISP 299 Replies latest members politics
Asking WHY?? in your subject title implies that the police did WRONG. You have jumped to this conclusion because the "newspapers" said there might be a problem.Newspapers in Britain and also in the USA and Canada have always been very quick to bring the "NEWS" to people before all the facts are out.
I will reserve judgement on the actions of the police untill more time has passed.
I do look forward to your next post...."Massive Police Coverup in Deaths of Bombing Suspects"
So basically you know you are going to kill him...you just got to justify it
Interesting. Do you live you life believing this?
steve
Yes when big stories first come out a lot of inaccurate information is given to the public and it takes a few days for the real picture to emerge accurately. That's what happened with the bombings two weeks ago. It's too early to say if the police behaved correctly or not under those circumstances.
Interesting.Do you live you life believing this?
Nope...its an attempt to understand what happened. I think if you want to arrest someone you do it. If you know where they reside ...even better. If you see them leave them leave the house...an ideal opportunity.
ISP
Neither its a bad police-ing thing.
or maybe a "couldn't possibly have enough info to have an informed opinion" thing?
So do you have problem with cops? Maybe I am wrong. Maybe you don't. I just don't recall seeing any "Cops did a great job today" articles posted by you. So it seems like you are more interested in pointing out when they might have screwed up?
Have you had bad experiences with cops?
I sure have. I have had guns pointed at me twice when I literally didn't do anything to warrant it.
On the other hand, I have met quite a few good cops.
...and besides if I do have a problem what am I going to do, call a hippie?
What you may have overlooked is that they followed the guy from home and basically executed him.
What is the evidence for this?
Seemingly had no where to go and was cornered. It wasn't that they saw him at the station. If you had come accross a terrorist and you kindly invited him to stop - do you think he would?
As you have pointed out, he was be watched, under suspicion, he was not a terrorist but a suspect.
How many maniacial persons would respond compliantly?
Er?????
So basically you know you are going to kill him...you just got to justify it.
Of what purpose would it be to execute a good citizen of you own country? Which will come out if indeed he was a good citizen.
I'm interested, what do you think their real motives for this execution are?
steve
You have jumped to this conclusion because the "newspapers" said there might be a problem.Newspapers in Britain and also in the USA and Canada have always been very quick to bring the "NEWS" to people before all the facts are out.
The papers so far have not said there might be a problem. I have. The papers have pretty much just told what they know without drawing any conclusion. I've given the links to the papers. If you think the papers are misleading please say where.
ISP
So do you have problem with cops? Maybe I am wrong. Maybe you don't.
No problem with cops here. I know one socially. You are wrong no maybes about it.
ISP
The whole thing sounds "bad". If he was a bomber why let him go into the station in the first place?
I do not think that they believed he had a bomb because they would not physically tackle someone - you would shoot them from a distance.
This sounds like someone getting completely carried away or a deliberate execution. Either way it is BAD.
It's not really a case of the mass media wanting to mislead but they often get info that proves unreliable later on eg in the earlier bombings they were saying that the explosions occured in a 40 minute period of time but in fact they occured within minutes of each other.
