A comment I heard tonight

by Generic Man 300 Replies latest jw experiences

  • Schizm
    Schizm
    The variance here between my understanding and the way it's explained in the publications isn't something to get extremely excited about.

    Sure it is, Schizm. You've admitted apostasy by not only having secret differences of opinion from that printed by your mommy, but even going further in running ahead of the organization by publicizing your dissent to others in the Society and here for the world to see.

    You are a hypocrite, bud.

    Jean

    Not so! A "hypocrite" is a person who says one thing and does another. I haven't done that. I haven't claimed to be in full agreement with the WTS. There are indeed some hypocrites who post here at this board. For example, there are some here who actually despise the WTS and yet still go to the meetings, hiding their true feelings from those sitting next to them. Of course you're not about to refer to those who hide what they truly are as "hypocrites". You're a typical apostate, you get everything backwards.

    Also, a real apostate is someone whose activity runs the risk of undermining the faith of others in the Congregation. Can you show me where I've subverted the faith of others by something I've said here? No, you can't.

    Too, a real apostate is a person who no longer has the best interests of the WTS at heart. Can you truthfully say that my comments here is against the best interests of the WTS? No, you can't do that either.

    You and OldSoul are 2 mighty fine examples of what a real apostate is.

    .

  • Schizm
    Schizm
    In the case of David, he obviously used deceit but it was not to protect God's name or his organization. It was to protect himself from physical harm.

    I expected you to say that. The point is, though, that for a good cause David used deceit without being condemned by God. The WTS has likewise used deceit for a good cause. You condemn what God himself apparently doesn't condemn.

    .

  • Schizm
    Schizm
    I have one finger for the old "elder said" schtick.--OldSoul.

    It's okay for you to talk that way, OldSoul, but as for me, I dare not follow your example.

    .

  • jeanniebeanz
    jeanniebeanz
    A "hypocrite" is a person who says one thing and does another. I haven't done that.

    Actually, you have. You acknowledge that the society has stated that witnesses are *not* supposed to associate with ex-members. You are a "Master Member" on a site that the WTBTS has deemed "bad association" and is dominated by ex-members. You claim to be a member in good standing, but if the truth were known, you would be brought up on charges of apostasy and disfellowshipped post haste, if for no other reason than defending the "truth" so poorly.

    Also, a real apostate is someone whose activity runs the risk of undermining the faith of others in the Congregation. Can you show me where I've subverted the faith of others by something I've said here? No, you can't.

    Wrong again. Can you possibly be so blind as to say that your very presence here has not encouraged witnesses to believe that it is okay for them to do likewise? You claim on a public site, available to anyone who wishes to see, that you are a brother in good standing and that it is okay to hold your own opinion on doctrine in direct opposition to the printed word of the Faithful and Discreet Slave. Do you not think that visiting witnesses will see you as an example to follow? You are guilty of stumbling your brother and are a liar.

    You and OldSoul are 2 mighty fine examples of what a real apostate is.

    Really? According to the dictionary,

    apostate

    adj : not faithful to religion or party or cause n : a disloyal person who betrays or deserts his cause or religion or political party or friend etc.

    Now let's see... According to you, you do not believe personally what is printed in the Watchtower in defiance of the GB (disloyal to your religion), you have become a master member on an Internet site predominantly frequented by *ex* witnesses in defiance of specific instructions to the contrary from the GB (betrayed the cause), and you have used the most foul and outrageous language, epithets, threatened in the most violent and graphic nature those who have opposed you and displayed an atrocious, foul nature that would make a mockery of all that Christ stands for.

    Who's the evil apostate? *hands Schizm a mirror*

    Jean

  • OldSoul
    OldSoul
    Schizm: I dare not follow your example.

    I dare not ask you to. I haven't, for that matter. I don't want people to follow my example. Unlike you and the WTS, I didn't tell you what to do, I told you my choice. Your choice is yours. I wouldn't have it any other way.

    Jeanniebeanz, there aren't words . . . too funny!

  • Schizm
    Schizm
    You claim to be a member in good standing....

    Then again:

    You claim on a public site ... that you are a brother in good standing....

    I challenge you to prove your claim. Of course you can't do it.

    You can't seem to get anything at all right, can you Jean.

    .

  • Schizm
    Schizm

    You all condemn the WTS for making use of what it calls "Theocratic War Strategy". Yet, each and every one of you would be guilty of doing the same thing if the right condition presented itself. I find it not surprising that nobody chose to address my post up above. Of course, I know the reason why you tippy-toed out around it.

    Here it is again. Anyone here brave enough to challenge it?

    I'm absolutely positive that every single person who posts here would use the same sort of strategy if ever they were to be faced with certain circumstances. For example: What if some stranger suddenly barged into your home one evening, and with a deadly weapon in hand demanded to know where your wife is? Would you tell this potential rapist exactly what he wanted to know? Like: "Well, she's in the utility room putting clothes on to wash." Or, would you give him misleading information? Like: "I have no wife." Or maybe: "She's not here at the moment."

    Since each and every one of you here would elect to give false information regarding the whereabouts of your wife, do you consider that to be a condemnable type of lie? Of course you don't! http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/12/88936/1.ashx

    Face it, you can't condemn the WTS's actions without condemning your own.

    .

  • Daunt
    Daunt

    Just my two cents Schizm. We aren't the ones claiming to be Jesus/Jehover's mouthpeice.

  • Schizm
    Schizm
    Just my two cents Schizm. We aren't the ones claiming to be Jesus/Jehover's mouthpeice.

    So that's all the defense you can muster? That's truly laughable! Perhaps you'd like to explain how what you've said makes the slightest bit of difference. You're saying that because you don't make the same claim as what the WTS does, then somehow you're justified in using deceit to protect your interests whereas they're not.

    That's really nice of you to be tying the hands of those who earnestly try to do God's will. Yes, rather than aid such ones, you'd prefer to cripple them. You're so eat up with hatred it's pitiful. Do you also hate yourself? How about your mother, father, or siblings? It wouldn't surprise me but what you do.

    .

  • jeanniebeanz
    jeanniebeanz

    Schizm,

    No, I think I have gotten quite a lot right about you. As have others only to receive the same arrogant treatment from you. One example out of hundreds:

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/79197/1303820/post.ashx#1303820

    I believe that you have some major differences of opinion with the Society, not just the issue of Ehud. I believe that you are a brother in good standing in the congregation, but inactive in spite of your protestations otherwise ( http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/79678/1302812/post.ashx#1302812 ). It is possible to be inactive and in good standing in practice. Whether or not the WTBTS admits this or not in print, I have witnessed it in practice in every congregation I have attended so my opinion of your standing in the congregation, if you even still go, stands. I also believe that you are a JW if even a marginal one because you have discussed "ceasing" meeting attendance and field service.

    However, you are secretly an apostate, biding your time hoping for a change in the organization that will make it come around to your line of reasoning. According to the Watchtower of Aug 1, 1980 a meaning of the term apostate can be ?a standing away from?. In that context, your views on the following WT teachings clearly are apostate, since they 'stand away from' the printed understanding:

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/65251/1008830/post.ashx#1008830

    A certain JW doesn't believe in the 1914 doctrine any longer.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/64226/988448/post.ashx#988448

    Quote: Can you think of anything that JWs believe in that is clearly unproveable???

    Yes. The doctrine of 1914 is one such example.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/65251/1011635/post.ashx#1011635

    Of course I personally don't accept the 1914 doctrine, for more than one reason, but I disagree with people who say that the WTS is guilty of "lying" in relation to their 607 date.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/67013/1041582/post.ashx#1041582

    You won't get very far there either, at least not at the present time (a problem that stems from the faulty 1914 doctrine).

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/72421/1156941/post.ashx#1156941

    How that anyone who knows the 1914 doctrine is based on error but still yet manages to participate in field service and meeting attendance is a huge mystery to me.

    Schizm, this is a major departure from the Societies teachings. You are clearly an apostate as well as a hypocrite for continuing to defend the Society knowing what you do about the cornerstone of their belief system. It is clear that you do not think the Society is lying, but is mistaken. This may be what makes it okay in your mind to stay with them.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/65251/1010412/post.ashx#1010412

    It seems that some people tend to think of an inacuracy as always being "a lie" ... instead of an error. Yes, although something that isn't "true" can be a "lie," there is such a thing as someone sincerely believing that something is true and accurate, yet is not ... which of course is then NOT "a lie".

    Other evidences of your apostasy including an admission of yours:

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/79678/1302812/post.ashx#1302812

    You know what? That makes me an "apostate" too ... because I've independently reached conclusions that are different from the Watchtower's explanations of some things.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/64226/988462/post.ashx#988462

    God didn't *create* Adam and Eve directly, so why would he *communicate* with them directly?

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/64226/988531/post.ashx#988531

    I have no problem with the particular "policy" of which you speak. However, I do fail to see how a *woman* can be one of the 144,000 (a king and priest during Christ's reign) and yet not qualify to represent the congregation in prayer, etc.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/12/71192/1127216/post.ashx#1127216

    I believe that the "tree of life" contained the unique ingredients that Adam & Eve needed in order to sustain their lives forever. I also believe that they were at least periodically eating from this tree, for the reason that the other tree was the only one of the two that was off-grounds for them.

    After just a few months of posting here, your frustration in not winning arguments was really beginning to become aggressive and you resorted to two year old politics of throwing a temper tantrum and deleting one of your posted topics because the answers that were coming in were not to your liking:

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/70607/1115034/post.ashx#1115034

    Schism,

    You've deleted your earlier comments for some strange reason. You've also inserted a post " A man that was pushed too far" that appears to be some kind of threat.

    I'm putting you in the cooler for 72 hours.

    By the middle of May last year you just self-destructed due to the increasing fire you were taking, into a rather bitter, disillusioned soul. This happened for good, I believe in a thread entitled "What 'exactly' changed in Adam when he sinned?" Located here: http://www.jehovahswitness.com/12/71192/1126943/post.ashx#1126943

    I believe that it was at this point not quite a year ago that you decided that you were having more fun being a jerk than actually discussing the issues in a spirit of reaching a common understanding. You really began to come into your own as the board jack**s.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/12/71192/1127315/post.ashx#1127315

    Abaddon,

    I've gone to the trouble to lead you to the waterhole. Now drink you dumb bastard, drink! You're not getting any more hay 'till you drink ... so drink you dumb bastard, drink!

    The only threads you have had or engaged in, in a reasonable way have been those that have no seriously adverse opinions expressed of your conclusions.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/71972/1145958/post.ashx#1145958

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/72046/1147722/post.ashx#1147722

    There have been a few threads since where you have shown a sense of humor. I was surprised to find that you are even a Johnny Cash fan (*gasp* I can almost forgive you all things on that basis, lol). But your posts for the most part have been rude, argumentative and full of ad homonym.

    I believe that the mistake that you made in your reasoning was that you were going to win defenders to your line or reasoning using your ?superior? argumentation skills. Problem is that many if not most of us have been badly hurt by the organization that you so vehemently defend in spite of your own reservations as a brother in good standing who is also inactive. What did you expect, man? Most people here are wise to the errors of the WTBTS and just don?t want to hear it defended any more. Especially by a verbally abusive, inactive brother who has his own doubts about the Org., and posts them on an Ex-Witness site.

    If you want to be a witness, by all means, go be a witness. Don?t hang about with people who have no interest in defending their lies any longer and then bemoan that fact that you are not, and will not, ?getting through? to them.

    Your frustration is that you were so convinced that you could "make a difference" here that when you could not persuade us you lashed out at us rather than admitting that your premise was flawed. This is in line with your reasoning when calling on a policeman to have him forcibly remove a teenagers tee shirt because the words "F*** You" printed on the back offended you. ( http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/15/71596/1137574/post.ashx#1137574 ) It speaks volumes to me as to how highly you value your own opinions over the opinions of others. Calling a cop to deal with your hurt feelings. That?s actually pretty funny when I think about it.

    What saddens me though is that you are obviously not stupid, and yet you now share the distinction of the title ?Village Idiot? with Scholar. You have demonstrated that, to a point, you can write convincing arguments, but when the challenges start flying, you cave into ad homonym ("Someone challenged me, call the police!!") rather than hit the books for answers or just saying "I don?t know." You seem to despise those who question you or worse engage in the terrible ?sin? of calling you what you are. I hope that you do not treat your wife with the same disdain when she questions you, but sadly, having known men in your age group who are just as backward thinking, she most likely puts up with a lot of verbal putdowns. You are someone who seems to have given up on his original intent of discussing teachings of the WTBTS when joining this site and now just wants to rile people up. I picture a 66-year-old man with a magnifying glass heating up an anthill. He?s angry that his religion does not see things his way and is just taking it out on those who had the good sense to leave.

    Many people here have pointed out your bent for ad homonym and rudeness, which you yourself have acknowledged. Just a couple examples:

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/79197/1303198/post.ashx#1303198

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/79197/1303202/post.ashx#1303202

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/79197/1311440/post.ashx#1311440

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/79504/1296026/post.ashx#1296026

    People in your current frame of mind are not worth discussing the issues with since you are not interested in any of our opinions unless they agree with yours, no matter how much effort we put into replies to you. You do not answer questions put to you if they are uncomfortable and then you claim that others do not address your points. You flip flop on issues, condone lying and subterfuge, are disloyal to your religion while you berate people who have had the courage to leave it because they cannot stand the hypocrisy, and then accuse those who have left of hypocrisy.

    In truth, I don?t know why you stay here especially in light of your own comments so long ago:

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/79678/1302322/post.ashx#1302322

    This IS an apostate board, a board comprised of people that is biased against any thought which might threaten their interests and the decision they've made to abandon what they once embraced as truth but now consider as evil.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/79197/1303198/post.ashx#1303198

    A Christian's time is more valuable than to expend it on person's who aren't interested in learning about why we die, why the world is in the shape its in, what hope there is for the future, etc.

    At any rate, I am quite done with you.

    Have fun shredding me publicly in my absence!

    Jean

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit