Is the "War on Terror" wrong? Why?

by 2escaped lifers 125 Replies latest members adult

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim
    Next time you visit a veteran's home, ask a disabled veteran how he might feel about supporters of McNamara, Westmoreland or better yet, how he feels about the defense industry and politics.

    Oh, I have...the opinions are as varied as the people I ask.

    As to your little insults to me...I'll just ignore them...all your huff and bluff does is reveal that you don't like the State of Israel. I would surmise from your comments you would join Arafat and Hamas in driving the Jews into the sea...

    But...this thread isn't about Israel...it's about the War on Terror...in which Israel happens to be our strongest ally.

    We are a loyal group...so even if you are correct (you aren't) and the Arab world hates us because we support Israel...the Arabs will just have to get over it.

  • blacksheep
    blacksheep

    "Recently a Pakistani here in Chicago, who moved here a few years ago, told me that Americans are not getting it. This whole issue is not about legitimate grief with American ... rather it is seething hatred that has been biding its time since the end of the Crusades hundreds of years ago ... oddly enough on Sept. 11th. They harbor and teach this hatred to their children and never forget ."

    Your comments are similar to Yeru's. So, how in the heck do we go back to correct the damage done during the crusades? We're responsible for that?

    Really, I think this just underscores how many people don't understand the issue, the people, their intense hatred of the US and westernized culture. Clearly, the Taliban rule was reactionary; women's rights were suppressed; they were not allowed an education, they could not even appear in public for fear of being beaten/raped; they had no rights. These cultural practices and violation of human rights were occuring also at the time of the crusades: they haven't progressed a whit.

    I also believe that Islamofascists bitterly resent the fact that the US has a clearly pluralistic society: we don't kill, maim, torture and otherwise obliterate those whose religious beliefs are different from the mainstream. We tolerate differences. We have synagogues, mosques, churches, kingdom halls. Tolerance is just not a concept that these terrorists understand: it's one way or no way. Tolerance in a nation, and one that attracts people of all nationalities because of economic opportunity, religious freedom, and political freedom, is extremely threatening to their way of life and their belief system.

  • Bendrr
    Bendrr

    Oh great, here comes the "Zionist Conspiracy" crowd!

    Mike.

  • patio34
    patio34

    Hi BlackSheep,

    You said:

    "The best way to fight terrorism is to stop participating in it" (or the 1st thing to do) -- Noam Chomsky (I said)

    Interesting. So how would you apply this advice to 9/11? Should we have done nothing? Promised the Taliban and their supporters that we don't intend ever to hurt them so as to set some sort of example?

    I'm tired and it's late and my son's still in the hospital, so i'm preparing you for (and trying to excuse myself!) a probably really bad answer. Chomsky, in the context of what i remember he said, was talking about all the meddling and invasions the US has done since the 50s, Panama, Chile, Viet Nam, Iran, Iraq, etc. I know this could open a can of worms, but i'm just giving the context here. Chomsky's overall view, it seems, is that the US has been practicing terrorism for decades and making enemies by doing it. Thus, he said what he did. But i'm not defending this statement and providing data. Anyone who's read Chomsky knows the supportive data is there. I think he's brilliant. Anyway, it's not popular with some on this board and i don't care. we're all entitled to our opinions and heroes. Chomsky is one of mine. By the way, I enjoy your posts, Black Sheep. Warm regards and sleepily, Pat
  • Abaddon
    Abaddon

    Jayson;

    Abba I don't know why you begin with the snive choir comment. I agree with most of what you say. If laws were enforced and the CIA, FBI, worked closer together maybe 9/11 could have been stopped. (your point right?)

    I was saying that Yeru thinking the world changed on 9/11 is unrealistic. You know Aliens, where one of the Marines loses it and starts screaming how fucked up it is and that they are all going to die?

    Well, the chain of events that lead to that was already in place. It was already fucked-up. They were (apart from Sigourney as she's a babe, and babes don't die in movies) all going to die already. They just didn't know it yet.

    Thus it is with 9/11. That's when people realised how fucked-up it was. It already was fucked-up, but they hadn't noticed. The Republican Male Voice Choir is I fully admit sarcasm; I don't mention who its members are, they elect themselves by their harmonic response. There is equally a Pinko-Commie Brassband, so don't feel you're being singled-out.

    Just as many Americans believe from their toes up that America is great, regardless of opposing argument, so to English people feel that sarcasm is right, regardless of opposing argument. Both attitudes probably get up other peoples noses sometimes.

    Americans believe in the 9/11/Saddam connection. But, there is no proof, not as Bush sells it. At best if one wants to believe that then it is a moral connection. (whats that?) Al Capone was put in prison for tax evasion. Is that what the government was after him for? No. But I think that getting rid of him any way they can is great. Same with the war on Iraq. America did it there because it could. More people need to just say it.

    And as we're discussing in that other thread, some people believe that the 'how' isn't important. Other people believe that the 'how' could possibly make things worse. We'll know who is right in five years time, and I doubt whoevers right will gain ANY satisfaction from being right.

    Simon I would love to see the UK come back to individual rights as opposed to surrendering rights to the State.

    Sorry Jayson; I feel more free in the UK than the USA. I can watch TV and see the Queen and leading politicians talked about in ways I have never seen American celebrities or politicains talked about on TV in America. I can have hair half-way down my back in a rural backwater and be accepted with a nod, rather than having a bunch of guys in CAT-hats watch me walk from car to cashier in a gas station as though I had two heads, or notice that I'm the only man with long hair in an entire shopping mall. I can go to an abortion clinic without having people spit at me, as those that would disagree with my actions tend to respect my own freedom to do it. I can even pretend that business influence doesn't play a major part in politics - something no American can credibly believe.

    I know the UK is not perfect; most English people do. If you overhear a talk about Britain in a pub, you're more likely to hear complaints and criticisms than 'Gee, isn't the UK the greatest country on Earth' - and we're equally critical of our country (or I am) when talking about it to foreigners. I like the realisim. The love of a flawed thing and hope that it will get better.

    Maybe we're just an island of born cynics; do you remember the first Superman movie? SUperman is on top of the Capitol Dome, replacing the flag, and he says 'I fight for truth, justice and the American way'. It always got a laugh in English cinemas as it's so pretentious.

    It's like re-writing history so Enigma is recovered by Americans, or the Battle of Britain's tide is turned by an American pilot. If a country has to appropriate and alter bits of history to fit in with it's patriotism, something is a little out-of-whack.

    Oh, and saying that the US is biased towards Israel is an observation, not anti-Zionism. If you changed the Israelis into Palestinians and vica-versa so that Arabs (with no real political lobby in the US) were doing to Israelis (with a big political lobby in the US) what we see being done each day on TV the other way round, the USA would have intervened years ago to 'free' the Israeli's from the Arab 'racist reigeme'. If you deny that, you've got a curious grip on reality.

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim

    Abbadon,

    If your contention is that the world had already changed before 9-11 and it was only after the fact that we realized it...I can buy that.

    Americans believe in the 9/11/Saddam connection. But, there is no proof, not as Bush sells it.

    See...this is a bogus arbuement....Bush never "sold" Iraq being involved in 9-11...he has Iraq involved in TERRORISM, not 9-11. Having said that...the Czech goverment STILL insisits the meeting between Ata and Iraqi intelligence took place...hmmmmm

    Maybe we're just an island of born cynics; do you remember the first Superman movie? SUperman is on top of the Capitol Dome, replacing the flag, and he says 'I fight for truth, justice and the American way'. It always got a laugh in English cinemas as it's so pretentious.

    It didn't seem so darned pretentious in the Revolution...the War of 1812, our Civil War, WW1 or WW2

    Oh, and saying that the US is biased towards Israel is an observation, not anti-Zionism. If you changed the Israelis into Palestinians and vica-versa so that Arabs (with no real political lobby in the US) were doing to Israelis (with a big political lobby in the US) what we see being done each day on TV the other way round, the USA would have intervened years ago to 'free' the Israeli's from the Arab 'racist reigeme'. If you deny that, you've got a curious grip on reality.

    What is the damned fascination with the US and Israel being allies...we're allies with England too...but no one is harping on that. Has anyone ever stopped and thought that part of our relationship with Israel is based on the fact that a significant number of it's citizens are former american citizens?

    'free' the Israeli's from the Arab 'racist reigeme'. If you deny that, you've got a curious grip on reality.

    This might or might not be true IF the Palestinians were largely American...wholely DEMOCRATIC..and if the Jews were constantly attacking Palestinains blowing themselves up in busses killing babies..women..and children.

    I don't prentend Israel isn't a tough situation...but your view of it...from what I can tell on the board...makes the Israelis out the bad guys and Palestinians the victims...but I don't remember ever hearing of the Israelis taking Palestinian school kids hostage and killing 20 of them...or blowing up school buses...or walking into Arab homes and shooting everyone inside...etc etc etc

    This thread is about Terrorism...you've not at all addressed whether the war is good or bad.

    The Palestinians relationship to terrorism is this...Arafat IS a terrorist...the PA condones terrorist acts...Isreal knows about battling terrorism...they've been dealing with it all their lives. The Palestinians...yep...tough situation...not helped by the surrounding Arabs who have tried their best to keep them in Camps and not letting them assimilate into society. Munich...terrorism...PLO/PLA Terrorists...Hamas...Fatah Terrorists. To approve of what they do is to approve of the intentional murder of children. It's like supporting NAMBLA...kids get hurt on purpose.

  • Abaddon
    Abaddon
    If your contention is that the world had already changed before 9-11 and it was only after the fact that we realized it...I can buy that.

    It is and I'm glad as them is the facts.

    You then (accidentally I think) make a quote begining "Americans believe in the 9/11/Saddam connection..." look like it's mine; it's not. I still raise your Czech intelligence 'confirming' Al-Q/Iraq links with my French intelligence 'confirming' Al-Q/CIA links.

    ... the War of 1812

    Superman could not have stood on top of the Capitol Dome in 1812 and waved a flag around as British troops had just burned it down. Ha, ha and thrice ha. (that was me being Patriotic? Jingoistic? Nationalistic? Ironic? Sarcastic? Facetious?

    What is the damned fascination with the US and Israel being allies...we're allies with England too...but no one is harping on that. Has anyone ever stopped and thought that part of our relationship with Israel is based on the fact that a significant number of it's citizens are former american citizens?

    Are you saying it is okay for a country to pursue a campaign of ethnic based zoning and human rights violations if many of its citizens come from the USA?

    I know you're not, so you might want to retract that as an argument as it just sounds like 'My Country Right or Wrong' transmogrified into 'My Countries Former Citizens Right or Wrong'. Does the USA give billions to the UK in aid every year? What the hell; Yeru, I've accepted a long time ago that you are virtually incapable of accepting that US foreign policy has any role in the way other countries view it.

    This might or might not be true IF the Palestinians were largely American...wholely DEMOCRATIC..and if the Jews were constantly attacking Palestinains blowing themselves up in busses killing babies..women..and children.

    This ignores the fact that America's partisan treatment of the countries in the area has engendered and allowed the situation to develop. See above paragraph re. you not accepting US foreign policy can have negative effects.

    Also, could you please PROVE that Israels population is largely American in origin; I think you'll find they are largely Russian in origin, and I am sure you would not want to support your argument with fabricated data.

    http://www.nationbynation.com/Israel/Population.html

    but your view of it...from what I can tell on the board...makes the Israelis out the bad guys and Palestinians the victims...

    No. Wrong. Read my posts. My view is that the UN should be given sufficient support to make Israel give Palestine fair borders, and stop the incessant cycle of violence, and give aid to Palestine to help it re-build a country; some of the $5billion a year Israel get each year from the USA would go a long way to rebuilding Palestine and also to restoring the faith of Arab people in the integrity of the world's superpower which - rightly or wrongly - they wouldn't wipe their arse on at the moment.

    This thread is about Terrorism...you've not at all addressed whether the war is good or bad.

    God Yeru, do you need subtitles! I was very clear that I am in favour of the removal of Saddam, but feel that pretexts were used and that this set a bad precident as well as undermining the credibility of the USA and UK internationally. I was saying that in the future tense before the war and have been saying that in the past tense after the war.

    I am also very clear in my doubt that an attack on Iraq could be justified under the banner of War on Terrorism, even though in many ways Saddam had it coming.

    If that doesn't fit into a convenient monochromatic worldview, well, sorry.

    To approve of what they do is to approve of the intentional murder of children. It's like supporting NAMBLA...kids get hurt on purpose.

    Who said I approve of what they do? I really don't think you have any idea of how desperate and hopeless someone is to think that blowing themselves up is a valid method of 'warfare' (the '' means I don't think it's warfare at all but is terrorism if targeting civilians, which it always is). People didn;t get that desperate and hopeless all by accident one day, it took years for them to get that way. If you thought about how an entire country can feel like that, then you'd see that those terrorists see themselves as freedom fighters fighting an unjust opponant who has massive backing, then maybe you'd truely appreciate the scale of the problem. It can't be solved without Isarael giving way to International pressure, but the USA is traditionally so in bed with Israel that Israel will carry on getting away with behaviour that would let any other country in the world see what the pointy end of a Tomahawk look like as long as the USA lets it.

  • Abaddon
    Abaddon

    Amazing; You say that Saudi has a higher per capita income than the USA; the figures I have show the USA has a per capita income THREE times higher than Saudi ($10,500 vs $36,200).

    Could you give me the source of your figures please?

    PS, I agree that Saudi is like a cancer, but would say that the large number of unemployed educated people with no hope of suitable jobs is the driving factor in the Muslim fundies success. The Royal family have an uneasy alliance with the religious leaders, and allow them to police the country according to the laws of a bunch of desert nomads from the 6th C. They (the Royals) are VERY rich.

    They also have a country that is strategically important as regards location but has a 50% chance of going bollock-up fundy in the next decade - internal tensions have risen steadily over the past decade.

    Oh look! It's going to take years to sort Iraq out.

    Do the math. Saddam was bad, but with side benefits of a new strategic base and lots of work for the boys, you can do good, further American influence over the region, and make money. God bless America!

    Essentially, the only thing that would really sort out the Arab world is developing a new power source. If you give a people whose cultural development (look at the treatment of women) is at least a hundred years behind the West, then they are going to make the same awful mistakes that the West made at the same level of cultural development, but with SCADS of cash.

    Deprive them of cash by not needing oil and they have to develop properly, and won;t have the cash to do harm whilst they do so.

  • digderidoo
    digderidoo
    makes the Israelis out the bad guys and Palestinians the victims...but I don't remember ever hearing of the Israelis taking Palestinian school kids hostage and killing 20 of them...or blowing up school buses...or walking into Arab homes and shooting everyone inside...etc etc etc

    Yeru, do you not know your history?

    Palestinians have been very much the victims in the conflict. Israeli soldiers HAVE killed Palestinian schoolkids. Israeli soldiers HAVE walked into Arab homes and not only taken shots but displaced many families from their homes. This happened at the source of the conflict and continues to happen.

    The Palestinian are poor people, they do not have an allie as big and powerful as the USA to provide them with the military weopons that Israel is provided with. The radicals only response to the injustice they see their people suffering is to take it to the Israeli streets.

    The only way to solve a conflict is to understand it, Yeru you fail to do this.

  • digderidoo
    digderidoo
    Who are they? About 20% of the Islamic world. Most Islamics want to be left alone and don't want to cause trouble. They don't mind working with the western nations. But it is the 20% that control Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and did control Afghanistan and Iraq. There are about 2 Billion Muslims ... so 20% means about 400 million Muslims continue the long tradition of hatred.

    Amazing, can you provide evidence of this assumption?

    Dig

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit