Mary,
Think of a ghost story investigation like a murder investigation. There are obviously a lot of details that have to be recovered to find the correct cause. I never claimed to be qualified to do this, but there are professionals who can. That is why I pointed you to the James Randi Educational Foundation.
The 'details' you provided me, while thoughtful, are really worthless. Just as a crime scene can not be investigated remotely and years later, I cannot give you an answer from incomplete second-hand information.
Also, you make many assumptions that may or may not be true. You assume that everyone in the house saw the phone jump. Is that really what happened? Did anyone actually see it jump at all? Since no one was near the phone, perhaps they just heard it fall and assumed it jumped. Or maybe one person saw it move from the corner of their eye and the rest just heard it. There are several scenarios and to just assume everyone in the house saw it can lead to an incorrect conclusion.
Perhaps there was a physical intruder in the house? Maybe an animal got in? Maybe the last person to use the phone or someone walking by accidentally put the phone in a precarious position so that it was inevitable that it would have fallen later? Maybe one of the kids is playing pranks on their credulous parents? I know I did that to my mom when I was a kid.*
The 'where' and 'when' questions were regarding geographic location and time of year and stuff like that. I hope you don't think I'm trying to worm my way out of providing an explanation (not that I ever volunteered to anyway), but as you can see, it's impossible for me to come up with anything conclusive with such little information.
Rem, get your head out of your ass - I KNOW what the word "ignorance" means and I don't need a dictionary explanation from you. It means someone who's not informed so don't sit there in your Almighty Chair, thinking you're so much smarter than everyone else, it's rather nauseating.
Look, I know you know what the word 'ignorance' means, but you are still misunderstanding what I meant by argument from ignorance. I suggest you read my post again as I could not have been any clearer. In the context I said it it has nothing to do with someone who's not informed, so your constant glossing over this point is rather nauseating to me. Just for emphasis, here is your argument from ignorance, which is fallacious reasoning:
Since we don't currently have a rational explanation for what happened, the only alternative is a supernatural explanation.
I do not think you are ignorant or uninformed at all. I just think you are using a fallacious argument as a basis for your belief in the supernatural. This argument happens to be... drum roll... an argument from ignorance. You are using our combined ignorance, or lack of knowledge, (yours and mine) of all of the facts to support your argument. How can I be in my Almighty Chair when I'm admitting my ignorance as well?
Rem have you ever had a friend tell you something? Something that YOU personally never witnessed? When they do, do you automatically assume that they're LYING to you?? If you do, then you probably don't have any friends. Why do you insist on insinuating that everyone is a liar or mistaken? What's that? Because you don't want to admit that there's no rational explanation for what happened???
This is an interesting point. It is true that when close friends tell you something, there is normally no reason to doubt them. But there is a limit to this trust, if you can call it that. The rule of thumb is: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If my friend were to tell me he got in a car accident the day before, I would surely believe him. If he were to tell me he was bitten by a shark the day before (and he lives in Kansas), I would be less likely to believe such an extraordinary claim without good evidence because shark bites are extremely rare and there are no sharks that I know of in Kansas. I would think he was pulling my leg unless he showed me the wound and could explain the situation or something.
The reason I'm very skeptical of paranormal claims by sincere people is because I have read much about psychological illusions and how complex and strange the brain and memory are. This doesn't mean people are crazy, but it is extremely easy for people to be mistaken in their perseptions. This is proven by decades of lab tests. The human mind does not present an objective view of reality. There are so many examples I could give, but it would probably be better if you just read the books to get the full flavor of the implications of these psychological illusions. I think people who sincerely believe there is no rational explanation for such phenomenon are engaging in wishful thinking. They are the ones who need some type of confirmation of a spirit world and all events extraordinary or not seem to be colored by those expectations.
Normal people rely on other people's word every day. That's nothing unusual
It's not unusual that relying on someone's word can be a mistake, either.
If you can give me some sort of scientific explanation as to how a phone can jump 5 feet when no one's around, I would be more than happy to listen to you.
I have provided some possibilities above, all much more likely than a supernatural explanation. I think the issue you have is that you assume the events happened exactly as you describe them without any critical investigation. You assume that the phone actually lifted off the table and moved 5 feet away without any outside influence. This is quite a leap of faith based on the scant information at hand. All we really know is that someone observed (not sure if they saw or heard or both) the phone in one location and then observed it in another location some time later. I doubt the observer was staring intently at the phone anticipating its movement, so there was most probably a time that the observer(s)' attention was diverted from the phone. The movement happened at this time.
Just like a crime scene, there are many details that need to be flushed out, and a quick synopsis of the event can lead to a very incorrect interpretation - especially if the story has been told many times over the years. This is the nature of human memory.
Unless you can give me SOME scientific hypothosis or theory as to what might have caused these episodes
As stated above, it is not necessary for me to provide a scientific hypothesis of how a phone can jump 5 feet without any outside influence because you have not proven that that actually happened. At most you've demonstrated that a phone moved and one or more persons partially observed it. I have provided alternate explanations that may or may not be correct because I do not know the details of the event.
Here are some books that expand on the human brain and memory. The type of psychological illusions that are possible are quite amazing and lead to interesting, though incorrect, perceptions:
- Pseudoscience and the Paranormal, Terence Hines
- Why People Believe Weird Things, Michael Shermer
- Demon Haunted World, Carl Sagan
- Consciousness Explained, Daniel Dennet
- How to Think About Weird Things, Schick
- In Search of the Light, Susan Blackmore
rem
*My brother an I used to have this old camera with a flashbulb when we were kids. My mom was always extremely fascinated by storms and lightening, so whenever there was a storm, we would flash the camera into the window when she was not looking. She really thought it was a close lightening strike because of the brightness of the flash even though there was no thunder. Her strong belief that it was really lightening was not shaken by the fact that lightening that close will always be acompanied by thunder. She was able to believe in something that wasn't real because it was real to her, even though it broke the laws of physics.