It is ultimately more satisfying to accept reality for what it is and find value and purpose in life.
That is a truth statement that assumes that YOU know what reality is. Why would you assume that? ...especially since your world view is that everyone including yourself is an accident? It makes no sense.
There is no 'TRUTH' there are only 'truths' or facts and data.
If there is no God (TRUTH) why do you put trust in facts and data that are just artifacts of explosions, unguided chaos and chemical accidents? What makes you think you can rely on them for stability (truth) ? Where does the information come from like DNA. DNA isn't just one code, but several codes. It is codes within codes and codes on top of codes like "epigenetics".
Says Dr. Georgia Purdom who has a Phd. in molecular genetics - "DNA is like discovering a coded message that means one thing when you read it in English, but if you pull out every third letter, it means something completely different in French".
How do you get this out of an unguided explosion? Please explain how unguided copying mistakes can form themselves into multilangualge codes at the same time. Do you have any other examples of codes (or any information for that matter) coming from anything other than a mind?
You seem confident that you have arrived at a place where you can put trust in accidental data and facts. But why should one chemical accident believe (or care) what another chemical accident chooses or believes if what you believe is true?
The atheist worldview is inconsistent. That is a fact. It is a demonstratable truth. Will you accept this fact and truth along with the others you have supposedly embraced?
If a person asks too many questions, they will soon find themselves outside of the WT organization. I believe the same thing can rob a person of their slumber in atheism.