what difference does it make if the monitoring is done on a "daily" basis, a "weekly" basis, or on a "as-needed" basis? It's not as if the information here disappears at the end of the day.......
again, a quote from Semonian, WTS spokesman in the above thread:
"...to 'readjust (the) thinking of those who post material critical of the religion on the web." "'This iswhat the Bible directs,' Semonian said 'If someone is causing dissension, we would meet with them--two elders (congregation leaders) usually--and discuss the matter. If indeed, he were causing dissension as the book of Eccliesiastes describes it, we'd readjust the man in a spirit of mildness. You'd calmly discuss it together so you can bring them back to their senses." (Emphasis added)
the Bible directs the WTS to "readjust the thinking" of critical posters on the web?...... when reading this article, you have to ask yourself, "how exactly would they "discuss" a matter with a anonymous poster?
Semonian then goes on to say that "they wouldn't disfellowship, they want to keep their members," or something to that effect......since when are "posters" on an apostate website members that the WTS is concerned with keeping?
as for a "non JW" monitoring....how helpful would this be?
Path, you mention that a paralegal could find a better job than the WTS.....of course they could, and most men could make better money than they do working for WT's printing press.......what's your point?...I thought you read the article, you were commenting on it........
Edited by - deddaisy on 10 June 2002 13:39:52