OTWO - did you even read those 2 horrible articles you linked?
.......So which of the two do you believe?
I am not an expert. But there are differing theories. My point was that us non-experts are not even working on theories, just inability to comprehend. The opening post suggests that living chameleons have no way of knowing how to mutate so the process doesn't make sense to the non-expert. But even us non-experts can learn that that isn't the way evolution works.
As far as those links, I read them. I get that they suggest conflicting things, but they show that if someone reads and examines and learns, they can come up with reasons for the evolution that took place. Whether one theory is flawed more than the other or both need work, things like that happen.
To me, even if EOM was not suggesting that evolution is false because he doesn't understand a few things, it comes out that way. That sounds just like fundamentalists who say some isolated thoughts on irreducible complexity prove that evolution is not true. But in reality, they just are at a normal education level and their minds cannot conceive how irreducible complexity just is not the reality they think it is.
I doubt that science is done changing some of their evolution theories. But it is pretty easy to look up some of the different theories out there and stop saying "I don't get how .... that can be done."
I made a simple post in the early part of this thread to say "That's not how it works" and many others made the point way better than I did, but EOM just plowed past those points and repeated basically, "I don't get how..... that can be done."
Well, I don't get how ballet can be done, but others do. I don't get how a rough diamond can be cut into a a masterfully crafted symetrical thing of beauty but some with the training can get it. Even if I never get how it's done, it's clear that someone out there does get it.