Thanks for your input Apog. If you notice this thread has had about 2,300 views, and I promise those who have posted account for a tiny part of that.
It seems that maybe some who reply to my posts don't understand the difference between acceptance and taking in answers vs debate.
If I ask a question, sometimes I am only looking for answers and I'll probably accept the explanation with no challenge. Sometimes I want to debate so if I ask a question, I am not responding in a way where I am accepting the information and believing it, but I am looking for loopholes.
I do not get upset with debate but it seems many do get upset and frustrated. They need to understand the positive aspects of it.
1. checks and balances - each side wants to believe it is correct and each side is predisposed to more easily agree and accept. The opposing side may be throwing questions looking for loopholes, etc.
2. In the end, it doesn't matter if either side changed their viewpoints, the exchange resulted in viewers/lurkers learning something, those in the actual debate whether they admit or not may have their standpoint weakened or solidified more.
Science itself doesn't advance without opposition. I'd be curious how many advancements in science may have been accidentally learned due to challenges to prove / back up something.
I think from now on I'll put a disclosure for any question I put on a thread if I intend to debate and find any little loophole in the answers or if I merely am looking for the most up to date belief / knowledge on a subject.
In the case of this specific thread, it was a combination of both. I couldn't find a good answer about chameleons ability to camouflage in relation to evolution and when asking I was also going to look for any loopholes.