Interesting recording. I'm amazed at the JW skill of framing scenarios and compartmentalizing knowledge in ways that hold up power relationships and the discrete direction they want to take things.. I know that sounded like gobbly-gook.
But what I mean is, the frame of that conversation was "helping Sam get sorted out." The onus is on her. She is the problem child. She is the one under inspection. She is the one being inquisitioned, sifted, judged, evaluated, etc. She is the mouse in the room, they are the cats.
Secondly, the knowledge of the whole situation, and her opinion or right to have a say is the smallest of voices. The judged has no rights. Only the demand to be disrobed in a "if you have nothing to hide, why can't we ask the most intimate and offensive of things?" manner. They are the prosecution, judge, and jury AND they often have complicating relationships with the people involved.
Jehovah's Witnesses are the best argument for the suggestion that religions may offer some good, but through the ages they have mostly been about control. JWs take the Bible to it's natural conclusion and THIS is what we end up with. That alone shows it was the wrong direction from the start.