The President addresses the Nation

by designs 257 Replies latest social current

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    After the American Civil War, southern states gained additional seats in the House of Representatives and representation in the Electoral College because freed slaves were granted full citizenship and suffrage. Southern white resentment stemming from the Civil War and the Republican Party’s policy of Reconstruction kept most southern whites in the Democratic Party, but the Republicans could compete in the South with a coalition of freedmen, Unionists and highland whites.

    Rising intimidation and violence by white paramilitary groups such as the White League and Red Shirts who supported the Democratic Party during the mid to late-1870s contributed to the turning out Republican officeholders and suppression of the black vote. [20] After the North agreed to withdraw federal troops under the Compromise of 1877, white Democrats used a variety of tactics to reduce voting by African Americans and poor whites. [21] In the 1880s they began to pass legislation making election processes more complicated. Although the Fourteenth Amendment reduced the Congressional representation of states that denied votes to their adult male citizens, this provision was never enforced.

    Harper's Weekly criticizing the use of literacy tests. It shows "Mr.Solid South" writing on the wall, "Eddikashun qualifukashun. The Blak man orter be eddikated afore he kin vote with us Wites."

    From 1890 to 1908, the white Democratic legislatures in every Southern state enacted new constitutions or amendments with provisions to disenfranchise most blacks [22] and tens of thousands of poor whites. Provisions required complicated processes for poll taxes, residency, literacy tests, and other requirements which were subjectively applied against blacks. As blacks lost their vote, the Republican Party lost its ability to effectively compete. [23] There was a dramatic drop in voter turnout as these measures took effect, a drop in participation that continued across the South. [24]

    The South became solidly white Democratic until past the middle of the 20th century. Effectively, Southern white Democrats controlled all the votes of the expanded population by which Congressional apportionment was figured. Many of their representatives achieved powerful positions of seniority in Congress, giving them control of chairmanships of Congressional committees. Because African Americans could not be voters, they were prevented from being jurors and serving in local offices. Services and institutions for them in the segregated South were chronically underfunded. [25]

    During this period, Republicans held only a few House seats from the South. Between 1880 and 1904, Republican presidential candidates in the South received between 35 and 40 percent of that section's vote (except in 1892, when the 16 percent for the Populists knocked Republicans down to 25 percent). From 1904 to 1948, Republicans received more than 30 percent of the section's votes only in the 1920 (35.2 percent, carrying Tennessee) and 1928 elections (47.7 percent, carrying five states). The only important political role of the South in presidential elections came in the 1912 election, when it provided the delegates to select Taft over Theodore Roosevelt in that year's Republican convention.

    During this period, Republicans regularly supported anti-lynching bills, which were filibustered by Southern Democrats in the Senate, and appointed a few blacks to office. In the 1928 election, the Republican candidate Herbert Hoover rode the issues of prohibition and anti-Catholicism [26] to carry five former Confederate states, with 62 of the 126 electoral votes of the section. After his victory, Hoover attempted to build up the Republican Party of the South, transferring patronage away from blacks and toward the same kind of white Protestant businessmen who made up the core of the Northern Republican Party. With the onset of the Great Depression, which severely impacted the South, Hoover soon became extremely unpopular. The gains of the Republican Party in the South were lost. In the 1932 election, Hoover received only 18.1 percent of the Southern vote for re-election.

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    . The Southern United States as defined by the United States Census Bureau

    In American politics, the Southern strategy refers to the Republican Party's strategy of gaining political support or winning elections in the Southern United States by appealing to racism against African Americans. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

    Though the "Solid South" had been a longtime Democratic Party stronghold due to the Democratic Party's defense of slavery before the American Civil War and segregation for a century thereafter, many white Southern Democrats stopped supporting the party following the civil rights plank of the Democratic campaign in 1948 (triggering the Dixiecrats), the African-American Civil Rights Movement , the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965, and desegregation.

    The strategy was first adopted under future Republican President Richard Nixon and Republican Senator Barry Goldwater [6] [7] in the late 1960s. [8] The strategy was successful in many regards. It contributed to the electoral realignmentof Southern states to the Republican Party, but at the expense of losing more than 90 percent of black voters to the Democratic Party. As the twentieth century came to a close, the Republican Party began trying to appeal again to black voters, though with little success. [8]

  • glenster
    glenster

    1932 presidential election — Franklin D. Roosevelt

    In 1936, African-Americans were added to the coalition (African-Americans had
    previously been denied the vote or voted Republican). For instance, Pittsburgh,
    which was a Republican stronghold from the Civil War up to this point, suddenly
    became a Democratic stronghold, and has elected a Democratic mayor to office in
    every election since this time.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realigning_election#Realigning_elections_in_United_States_history

    For political scientists, 1964 was primarily an issue-based realignment. The
    classic study of the 1964 election, by Carmines and Stimson (1989), shows how the
    polarization of activists and elites on race-related issues sent clear signals to
    the general public about the historic change in each party's position on Civil
    Rights. Notably, while only 50% of African-Americans self-identified as Democrats
    in the 1960 National Election Study, 82% did in 1964, and the numbers are higher
    in the 21st century. The clearest indicator of the importance of this election,
    was that Deep Southern states, such as Mississippi, voted Republican in 1964. In
    contrast, much of the traditional Republican strongholds of the Northeast and
    Upper Midwest voted Democratic. Vermont and Maine, which stood alone voting
    against FDR in 1936, voted for LBJ in 1964.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realigning_election#Possible_modern_realigning_elections_in_the_United_States

    The South, which had started to vote increasingly Republican beginning in the
    1930s, continued that trend, becoming the stronghold of the Republican party by
    the 1990s.[32] Political scientists Richard Johnston and Byron Schafer have ar-
    gued that this development was based more on economics than on race.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964#Political_repercussions

    1964 - the inspiration

    In 1964, Barry Goldwater accomplished a task that, until then, had been seen as
    physically impossible -- he won five states in the Deep South for the Republican
    Party, which had been seen for the past hundred years as the party of Abraham
    Lincoln and the defeat of the Confederacy. He was able to do this because of his
    voting record against civil rights legislation versus the incumbent, Lyndon John-
    son, who was in favor of civil rights. The South had, until that point, been a
    solidly Democratic voting bloc, often called the "Solid South." Nixon, taking
    note of this, campaigned on subtle race and states rights themes in 1968 and 1972
    in an attempt to keep the Deep South in the Republican column.

    That white Southerners could be persuaded to vote Republican in presidential
    races by the 1960s is attributable to the greater power of race than class by
    that time. For the first half of the 20th century, white Protestant voters in the
    South tended to be quite populist on economic issues, forming an important part
    of the "New Deal coalition" and supporting government infrastructure projects
    like the Tennessee Valley Authority. However, they were quite conservative on
    race and other social issues. For decades, class was more important than race be-
    cause of the greater poverty in the South, but with growing affluence after World
    War II, race began to be more important than class. The Civil Rights Movement
    that began in the 1950s and gained momentum in the 1960s put race in sharper per-
    spective, while other cultural changes in the 1960s (the sexual revolution, the
    counterculture, the New Left) also drove white religious conservatives away from
    the Democratic Party.
    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Southern_strategy#1964_-_the_inspiration

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    Civil Rights Act -

    Political repercussions [ edit ]

    See also: Realigning election President Johnson speaks to a television camera at the signing of the Civil Rights Act.

    The bill divided and engendered a long-term change in the demographics of both parties. President Johnson realized that supporting this bill would risk losing the South's overwhelming support of the Democratic Party. Both Attorney General Robert Kennedy and Vice President Johnson had pushed for the introduction of the civil rights legislation. Johnson told Kennedy aide Ted Sorensen that "I know the risks are great and we might lose the South, but those sorts of states may be lost anyway." [30] Senator Richard Russell, Jr. warned President Johnson that his strong support for the civil rights bill "will not only cost you the South, it will cost you the election." [31] Johnson, however, went on to win the 1964 election by one of the biggest landslides in American history. The South, which had started to vote increasingly Republican beginning in the 1930s, continued that trend, becoming the stronghold of the Republican party by the 1990s. [32] Political scientists Richard Johnston and Byron Schafer have argued that this development was based more on economics than on race. [33]

    Although majorities in both parties voted for the bill, there were notable exceptions. Republican senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona voted against the bill, remarking, "You can't legislate morality." Goldwater had supported previous attempts to pass Civil Rights legislation in 1957 and 1960 as well as the 24th Amendment outlawing the poll tax. He stated that the reason for his opposition to the 1964 bill was Title II, which in his opinion violated individual liberty and states rights. Civil rights supporters dismissed Goldwater's individual liberty argument by noting that he expressed no opposition to segregation laws forcing business owners to operate on a segregated basis. Most Democrats from the Southern states opposed the bill and led an unsuccessful 83-day filibuster, including Senators Albert Gore, Sr. (D-TN) and J. William Fulbright (D-AR), as well as Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, who personally filibustered for 14 hours straight.

  • designs
    designs

    The 1960s were indeed a time when the two major political parties reshuffled their constituents. Who would back the rising Civil Rights Movements and the Anti-War Movement. Things came to a head in Chicago 1968.

  • Simon
    Simon

    So democrats changed policies to gain black voters and republicans, who up till then had the black votes, persued prejudicial policies to appeal to the southern white voters - I guess what they considered made the south so solid democratic.

    The black vote switched sides because it seems the parties actually switched.

    The republicans now have a solid base in the jesus south but times changed and now the black vote carries things for the democrats.

  • designs
    designs

    It was very mixed in the 1960s with many pro-war Hawks and segregationists in the Democratic party. The young people began to make the decision to press their agendas on the political arena and see who was up for change.

  • wasblind
    wasblind

    The black vote switched sides because it seems the parties actually switched.

    The republicans now have a solid base in the jesus south but times changed and now the black vote carries things for the democrats.____Simon

    Yes, Now the latino vote is what the politicians strive for now. because they are a fast growin'

    population

    Here's the thing about our History. If we fail to know where we come from

    we are bound to revisit that same place. because we won't recognize the signs

    that point us back in that direction

    Two years after the emancipation was signed, ex-slaves now had a voice

    through a vote. And many couldn't even read

    Through thier votes they were able to help shape thier own future

    In the early years of thier freedom blacks even served as delegates for the southern states

    Some were ex-slaves. some were educated blacks from the north who came down

    to help in the reconstruction

    Now here are the things that happened to curtail the progress of blacks back then

    and these are the things that are still takin' place today

    They are the signs that will lead us back from where we started

    And if anyone fails to remember what the past signs were , they will revist

    a place they don't wanna be

    Little by little, things that helped the blacks durin' the reconstruction

    was done away wit for one reason or another

    This gave the opressors leverage to put in place laws that would

    strip the blacks of all they had gained over a short period of time

    the first thing the opressor needed to do was to get rid off the black delegates that

    they knew the black population would vote for. The best way to do that was to restrict

    thier votin' rights. Sound familiar ?

    And how did they do this ? They started complainin' that the black delegates were corrupt

    to create doubt in thier ability to lead

    Blacks were kept from the polls by economic pressure, becuase many ex-slaves

    were still dependent on the whites for food and wages. If they made an attempt to vote

    they would be left wit nothin'

    Places where they could vote were either move to secret locations

    or the black vote was often times thrown out

    All these action help return power to the oppressor

    All the progress blacks had gained in only a few short years after slavery

    were once again stripped away until the 1960's

    And the cycle continues to try and repeat itself and will

    if we refuse to recognize the signs

    .

  • designs
    designs

    Giving working people a hard time when trying to Vote either with restricted hours when the booths are open or making it difficult to sign up and register are just signs that old segregationist ways of thinking still linger in the minds of many in this country. When you are banking on low voter turnout you have a serious problem.

  • designs
    designs

    Supreme Court Justice Scalia wrote his opinion when striking down the 4th part of the Voting Rights Act- that it was an entitlement and actually used the illustration of this entitlement being like giving an entitlement to a child molester. So from the highest Justice system in the land you can see how we are not done with the issues of race and equality in this land.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit