SixofNine
Tal[iban-ana]would be completely within his rights to critisise, make fun of, comment on, any artwork that was part of a greater whole (such as a publication, ie: the WT or Awake).
Did you miss the boat on this one? I never said he didn't have the right to criticize, or make fun of, or comment on the WTB&TS artwork. But the wholesale pub. of their artwork on his webSite is tantamount to copyright infringement. Did he ask their permission to display and/or pub. their artwork? Well that's what you would need to do.
My argument with Taliban-ana is that s/he criticizes the WTB&TS for stealing Squibbs intellectual property rights and then s/he does the same thing in turn to the WTB&TS. Rips them off!!!
Taliban-ana isn't so much concerned with the issue of stealing intellectual property, s/he's ONLY concerned that it's the WTB&TS doing it to Squibb.
Hey Taliban-ana you might want to correct SixofNine's spelling too, or do you just brow-beat the peoples spelling who don't agree with you?
Oh that's right, you use spelling and grammar as a weak attempt to discredit ONLY the people who don't agree with you or kiss your most worshipful ass.