When you don't go along politicly with an agenda or bias, you are not seen as a "peer".
Actually, it's when you don't have the qualifications to understand and provide critical review. For instance, you would not be able to peer review any of my papers. Nor would a geneticist, for that matter, they don't have the background and qualifications to understand the work.
I his mind I can not be allowed to even question these theories.
First, you don't know what it in Cofty's mind. Second, it seems as if you don't understand them well enough to know if the questions are valid or why you are asking them. If so, answers are pointless.
A good question is a good question, it should not matter who asks it.
Agreed, but not all questions are good.