I dont know how difficult it is to grasp this, i mean if you looked at it from a science point of view, from the creation of the ark to the time and how how the waters drained back its all POSSIBLE. Science only proves God and an intelligent creator.
Oh, my, you actually are convinced that it's true. That, my boy, is called cognitive dissonance. Have you ever taken any engineering? Mine is pretty rusty now. I've been out of it for years. Same goes for my natural sciences. Once I rose into management I lost all that good stuff because I didn't use it. But I can still tell you the ark as described in Genesis suffers from two major deficiencies. It's too big and it's too small. The structure as described, even unloaded, would break up in the smallest of seas. Any competent naval engineer would tell you that. Load it and it will break up even faster. For a structure that size to float and support a load it would have to be constructed of rivetted and welded steel members for strength and then clad in heavy rivetted sheet steel for rigidity. No matter how well you built it, a wooden structure would not work. And it's too small because it could not possibly hold all the species it had to hold in order for them to be around today. I can cite the numbers for you but you can look them up yourself if you're really interested in verifying what you believe. And then you've got to figure in all the food and effort required to feed all those animals, some of which eat up to 450 kg of vegetation per day, all the while getting rid of all their shit for 190 days - and all this done by 8 people? Do you know how many people it takes to run the San Diego zoo? It is something like 1,500, and they have a tiny representative fraction of the earth's animals on site. Give your head a shake.