Ok, we get it - you don't like some of the words and phrases that Barb used and will make damn sure to point out the error of her ways whether it is something she posts now or something she said in a topic many years ago.
What she does and the message isn't important, all that matters is the tone used and how it makes you feel.
Got it.
Sheesh.
Some of us appreciate the message though and the effort and research and cost that goes into providing it so please feel free to shut the hell up whenever you feel you've had enough, Ok?
Simon, with all due respect, I don't think you'll find anyone on here who doesn't appreciate what Mrs.Anderson has contributed to The Cause. However, its a disservice to her reputation, as well as the movement when someone of her caliber lowers the bar and gets involved with what I like to call Tabloid Apostacy. As someone who finds himself unwittiingly in the middle of a rock and a hard place as a born in JW who's in too deep to simply walk away, I don't exactly appreciate it when someone gets my hopes up with tabloid threads. Its especially unsettling when its a poster who's reputation precedes them, such as Mrs.Anderson. Not only that, but I'm still yet to find the post that was particulary offensive to Mrs.Anderson and her constituents. The lack of such an inflammatory post, at least inflammatory in my definition of the word, leaves me questioning whether she's above criticism. The comment by Betsy, I found even more disturbing as he likened anyone who has constructive criticism for the so called elite of WT apostates, to be anonymous peanuts. This is one anonymous peanut poster who would have smacked flames out of him had I been in the same room with him after he verbally made such a comment.
