Nowhere is it stated that Jesus was Michael, heck Mike didn't even have a name tell Daniel gave him one while captive in Babylon, as he did with Gabriel. And Daniel named Michael as ONE of the chief Angels (Prince) not THE Chief prince.... Nowhere do we get that Jesus was an archangel, to get there one must interprt certian verses, ignore others and twist meanings to suit ones fancy and that is wrong.
The root of the word "archangel" is "chief" as in Michael was the "chief angel." I just through you might want to know this.
And according to the WT, Michael the archangel was the angel who the Israelites followed in the Exodus.
Exodus 23:20 Here I am sending *an angel* (Jesus according to the WT) ahead of you to keep you on the road and to bring you into the place that I have prepared
Again, the Bible contradicts WT teaching!
How exactly does Exodus 23:20 constitute a contradiction?