Nebuchadnezzar didn't come into power until 605 BCE, but I would suppose the WTS would
disregard that fact as well. There has been more archaeological evidence to when the destruction of Jerusalem occurred
since the known information of Russell and Rutherford times, will the WTS accept that is highly unlikely since it would destroy
their 1914 doctrine to smithereens, making themselves appear ignorant and unreliable.
They have built up this organization/kingdom on lies and ignorance by their own design, they have
therefore a forthright agenda to keep what they have achieved.
One thing to learn from all of this is, religions who have made strong pronouncements
involving their own self constructed doctrines, will hardly ever revert their position
revealing their own created diverse ignorance. Religions such as the JWS operate and sell themselves
on creating an illusion that they are unique and have special status among other religions.
To make a move in changing vital doctrine would crack and break open this illusion.
There seems to be an enormous amount of information now through archaeological findings regarding when
ancient Jerusalem was invaded by Nebuchadnezzar that give evidence to the 586 BCE date. Will
the leaders of the WTS. ever confirm that themselves, I hardly doubt it, they aren't really concerned
about the truth or facts per-say , instead they're only concerned about up holding the truths that
they themselves created in developing their organization.
In effect religions taint the truth to support and serve themselves.