I need some good sriptures & reasoning to refute Jesus = Michael Archangel (page 10)

PSacramento

Spike,

Answering a question with a question?

Dude...cop-out alert !!

LOL !

Spike Tassel

I follow Jesus' precedents in this regard.

PSacramento

Spike,

Jesus asked questions about Einstein ? Cool !!

Spike Tassel

must be, the WT publications do refer to his work, after all

Trevor Scott

: "That's like saying that elders aren't publishers, isn't it?"

Um. Perhaps to you. But... no... it's not.

Let's go simpler this time.

God NEVER said to any angel, "sit at my right hand until I make your enemies into a footstool for you". (Heb 1:13)

God DID say to Jesus, "sit at my right hand until I make your enemies into a footstool for you". (Mt 22:42-44)

Even simpler:

God NEVER said "X" to any angel. God DID say "X" to Jesus.

This (biblical) assertion can only be true if Jesus is NOT an angel.

It's called logic. You should try it sometime.

Peace.

Spike Tassel

it's Good News, authentic truth always is, right?

PSacramento

Consider this, every single commentary on Hebrews makes it clear that Chapter 1 is a refute of any view that Jesus was an angel at any point in time.

Even the commentaries they have at the WT HQ, *gasp* !

Of couse if one wants to play the "interpretive passage to suit us" game, I guess that IF Jesus can be Michael, by the very same "reasoning" ( Selctive interpretation of selective passages), Jesus is part of the Trinity.

So there, we are all happy and we are all right !

* and there was much rejoicing in the village*

Spike Tassel

either a Trinity (using the spurious 1 John 5:7 addition), or a trinity (using John 17:11).

Trevor Scott

or a red herring using either

I need some good sriptures & reasoning to refute Jesus = Michael Archangel

Share this