The abuse thread?
I noticed. I didn't even get a PM.
BTS
by inrainbows 206 Replies latest members adult
The abuse thread?
I noticed. I didn't even get a PM.
BTS
I think people are born gay and there is nothing the can do about it.
I think people are born gay and there is nothing the can do about it.
What about people that claim they have changed their sexual orientation? Delusions? Lies? BTS
What about people that claim they have changed their sexual orientation? Delusions? Lies?
Both.
Both.
Evidence please?
What about people that claim they have changed their sexual orientation? Delusions? Lies?
I can't speak for other people but maybe some are bi-sexual and/or are confused because of their upbringing and because of social pressure. We are all individuals and I think from one person to the other the journey to self discovery can be very different.
I second that uprbinging comment.
Evidence please?
Evidence that they can, please. I think the overwhelming evidence is on my side. History is replete of extremely cruel methods of attempting to "convert" gays to straight, including shock therapy, institutionalization, social pressure, even threats and actual murder. Yet... gosh, all those folks have "chosen" to be gay. Give me a break.
I hate to be a cut and paster, but here we go from wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_therapy#Studies_on_malleability_of_homosexuality
Studies on malleability of homosexuality
The APA stated: "In the last four decades, 'reparative' therapists have not produced any rigorous scientific research to substantiate their claims of cure." It has called for more scientific research to determine the risks and benefits involved, and until such research is available, recommended that "ethical practitioners refrain from attempts to change individuals' sexual orientation." [8] However, there are anecdotal evidence of effectiveness. Studies from the 1950sā1980s generally reported rates of positive outcomes at about 30%, with more recent survey research generally consistent with the extant data. [7] In a survey of 882 people who were undergoing therapy, attending ex-gay groups or ex-gay conferences, 22. 9% reported they had not undergone any changes, 42.7% reported some changes, and 34.3% reported much change in sexual orientation. As a group, they reported large reductions in homosexual thoughts and fantasies and improvements in their psychological, interpersonal, and spiritual well-being. [110]
A 2002 peer-reviewed study found that 88% of participants failed to achieve a sustained change in their sexual behavior and 3% reported changing their orientation to heterosexual. The remainder reported either losing all sexual drive or attempting to remain celibate, with no change in attraction. Some of the participants who failed felt a sense of shame and had gone through conversion therapy programs for many years. Others who failed believed that therapy was worthwhile and valuable. Of the 8 respondents (out of a sample of 202) who reported a change in sexual orientation, 7 worked as ex-gay counselors or group leaders. [45]
In 2001, Dr. Robert Spitzer, who was involved in the APA's declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder, presented a paper on conversion therapy at the APA annual convention. He reported that 66% of the men and 44% of the women he sampled had achieved "good heterosexual functioning" through interventions. [134] This paper was widely reported by proponents of conversion therapy as evidence of success of the therapy.
The APA immediately issued an official disavowal of the paper, noting that it had not been peer-reviewed and stating that "There is no published scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of reparative therapy as a treatment to change one's sexual orientation." [135] Two years later, Spitzer published the paper in the Archives of Sexual Behavior. The publication decision sparked controversy and one sponsoring member resigned in protest. The paper has been criticized on various grounds, including using non-random sampling and poor criteria for "success". Critics argue that it relied upon samples selected by conversion therapists themselves (86 participants were handpicked by ex-gay organizations), that proper random samplings were not used, that small samplings were used, that the subjects appeared to be ex-gay advocates who may have been biased in favor of conversion therapies, that 60% of the subjects had previously reported being bisexual, and that no follow-up study had been carried out to ascertain long-term conversion. [136] [135]
Spitzer himself played down the results of his own paper; upon being asked about the 200 patient sample after 16 months, and the percentage of people who might succeed, Spitzer said that it took almost a year and a half to only find 200 willing individuals, and therefore, the number of gay people who could successfully become heterosexual was likely to be "pretty low". He also conceded that the study's participants were "unusually religious." [135]
Likewise, there are non-peer-reviewed studies that show evidence of change, conducted either by NARTH or other professional therapists. For example, many groups point to "Ex-Gays? A Longitudinal Study of Religiously Mediated Change in Sexual Orientation", a book published by researchers Stanton Jones and Mark Yarhouse. [137] The study showed that out of a sample size of 98 people who sought a change in their sexual orientation, 15% reported a change in orientation over a three year period. [138] The American Psychological Association is currently looking into the results of this study. [139]
Major medical organizations and others do not accept the anecdotal evidence offered by conversion therapists and ex-gay groups for reasons including: [135] [140]
With respect to the last point, one commentator argues that the reason for the focus on gay men is more political than medical. He argues that conservative and rigidly defined gender roles are the core value system used by conversion therapists, and that male sexuality, with its emphasis on masculine and patriarchal hierarchies, is seen as more important and valuable than female sexuality. [141]
Evidence that they can, please. I think the overwhelming evidence is on my side
Talk to these people about their personal experiences, what does the APA have to say about that?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex-gay#Ex-gay_people
BTS
Talk to these people about their personal experiences, what does the APA have to say about that?
Lol.... are you kidding me? They all run or are part of religious organizations that have a vested interest in "proving" that homosexuality cannot possibly be innate, because if that were so, "god' screwed up and they would have a lot of explaining to do.
Show me one peer-reviewed study that purports to show that gay people can truly change their orientation. Not just behavior, but orientation. You can't. You can only point to abusive whack jobs like Cohen. The ex-gay movement has a very serious credibility problem.