Burger Time, Calm down. This is making you seem like you are more than a few fries short of a Happy Meal!
Wow let me just clarify something. I always hear the ID people saying the same thing, "well it the Christian religion explains it best for me".
Can you calmly explain exactly what it is that bothers you about people who are different than you coming to a different conclusion than you do based on the same evidence. We all have the same evidence. It's just interpreted differently.
Guess what, your not the only fucking person or religion on the planet.
No, but your tantrums make you appear as if you feel that you are.
Science must speak for all.
Science is ambivalent as to who it "speaks" to. It speaks to all or it speaks to none depending on how you look at it. The interpreters of it are the ones who in reality do the speaking. Currently, we have freedom of speech and bigotry issues dominating our universities and research institutions.... which is what a lot of what this thread is about.
We didn't get evolution by people who didn't believe in a god. In fact most of our theories come from those who believe in a deity of some sort, the thing is they know now that religion clouds judgment.
For every scientist who thinks religion clouds judgement there are those who think that it enhances it. Your statement above falsifies your own conclusion. Read it slowly.
Having a theory based around something that is religious paints you in to a square.
Can you give an example of such a theory? Also, do you think that atheist evolutionists create hypotheses based on their world view (no god) and then test them to see if they are true, and repeatable?
This hinders thought.
Or, it enhances thought based of the observers' world view....depends on how you look at it.
What happens when something defies religion?
Science doesn't defy religion. Real science just is what it is. Religion has more to do with ritual and its emotional ramifications.
What if a half man/ monkey was born? Would you argue for evolution then? All these ID people scream about missing links and such, but what would you guys do if one was found? You know what you would do, just start screaming about something else.
You appear to be the only one screaming here. Why are you so afraid of people who are not like you? At any rate, a half monkey and a half human would probably get someone thrown in prison based on current laws. Are you for such type of experimentation? I saw the other day a human ear being grown on the back of a rat. Made me sick...don't know why exactly, it just did. What is your point here? You seem angry all the sudden.
The religion would not change or the belief in God because of one thing found through Science. Science however can and does change immediately when something is found out. Suppression does not help science. Religion suppresses Science. It always has.
Earlier, you argued that believers are responsible for much of our known scientific knowledge. Now, here you seem to argue that believers repress science.
Can you reduce your point down to like one or two sentences?