I haven't read thru the replies, so others have probably noticed this as well; your site meets the standards of "fair use" on at least two, maybe more points.
It's quite obviously not a money making venture for you. It quite obviously IS for research. It quite obviously IS for criticism.
Your quotes are extracted from articles, not reproducing the entire text.
Those points aside, what could the WT possibly claim as monetary damgages? ZERO.