To be honest when this first conviction came down I didn`t see how on the evidence that was provided he could have been convicted the way he was .
Their definetely was an element of doubt about the case he was tried on.
However having said that I think and this is my own opinion he was convicted on what has been brought out how he was a friend of a known serial sex offender in the Catholic religion and he was in a position where he could move around priests that had a problem with abuse of children ,and he was in the thick of it in the Ballarat area where abuse was rife at the time ?
It will be interesting to see if other accusations will now be levelled at cardinal Pell either civil or criminal now that this particular case is now closed for good.