Dear billyboy
I'm glad you're able to recognize that Blondie has invested no small amount of effort in the weekly Watchtower articles. While I cannot speak for Blondie and I'm not here to judge whether she's as pedantic as you imply, I believe there are several advantages to writing up a critical piece like this.
1) It's a great way to get things of your chest.
2) It alerts others to the biased style of writing emplyed by the FDS.
How many times have we had to sit and listen to Sister Zealous or Bro. Holy Balls happily comment to reinforce the WTS dogma on:
the wickedness of this world ("there is nothing good left in it, Amen"),
higher education,
materialism ("simplify your life, but don't let the KH funds run into deficit, mind you!"),
reading of any material that contradicts the WTS, even if it is from a secular source ("APOSTASY!!!"),
etc...
There is little, if any ,acceptance of any point whatsoever THAT CONTRADICTS the article - it is all condemned. This appear to be a weekly effort TOO. Why are you not disturbed by this, billyboy?
When "discussing" the above topics, yes I admit the WTS occassionally makes a legitimate point, but do THEY not continue on a NEGATIVE BASIS?
And why does the WTS keep HARPING on the same issues again and again, sustaining the negativity of their followers towards other religions, towards their non-JW associates, towards any form of secular career? WHAT IS THEIR POINT? WHAT ARE THEIR MOTIVES for doing so?
To encourage current JW zealots they have made the right decision to stick with the organization?
To provide "food at the proper time" for still-in JWs who're too lazy or too brainwashed to realize that the WTS is intellectually dishonest?
INQ