the craziness of first-past-the-post elections .... we'll no doubt have to now live through the scotts demanding another referendum, because we may take their lands, but we will never take their freedom!
and so they want to be free of the uk, where they have a disproportionate influence in parliament, and be a little dot that's part of the eu.
yup, freedom.. but anyway, as it stands right now they have 48 seats after getting 1.2m votes.
Hold Scotland hostage long enough - Lol
Scotland isn't being held hostage. The SNP and other anti-English tossers need to respect the 2014 IndyRef result, it's as simple as that.
BTW how do we know if the SNP will respect a second IndyRef result if it goes against them for a second time? (they're not respecting the first)
the craziness of first-past-the-post elections .... we'll no doubt have to now live through the scotts demanding another referendum, because we may take their lands, but we will never take their freedom!
and so they want to be free of the uk, where they have a disproportionate influence in parliament, and be a little dot that's part of the eu.
yup, freedom.. but anyway, as it stands right now they have 48 seats after getting 1.2m votes.
@SBF - well, let's exercise some common sense ...
Scotland chose to remain in the UK in a once-in-a-lifetime referendum five and a half years ago. This result must be respected.
Anyone can clearly see that it's a bit too early to start talking about a second IndyRef right now.
First of all, the UK must leave the EU, with all the trade stuff needing to be done and dusted ('Brexit').
So, let's see ... the first IndyRef was in 2014.
How about having a second one in 2025 or 2030? <--- this seems reasonable to me.
the craziness of first-past-the-post elections .... we'll no doubt have to now live through the scotts demanding another referendum, because we may take their lands, but we will never take their freedom!
and so they want to be free of the uk, where they have a disproportionate influence in parliament, and be a little dot that's part of the eu.
yup, freedom.. but anyway, as it stands right now they have 48 seats after getting 1.2m votes.
Are you saying Scotland is not allowed to change its mind? - at the moment, Scotland (actually the SNP) needs to respect and live by the result of IndyRef 2014.
The Scots are allowed to change their minds in the future - just not right now.
could this be because - *gasp* - because this whole transgender scene is a big turn off?.
All the BBC have to do is write good episodes featuring well-written characters. The rest will take care of itself.
Whether a character is LGBT or not is a secondary consideration (or should be).
What people don't like is script writers putting a box-ticking character above the important things: a good plot, engaging characters, etc.
the craziness of first-past-the-post elections .... we'll no doubt have to now live through the scotts demanding another referendum, because we may take their lands, but we will never take their freedom!
and so they want to be free of the uk, where they have a disproportionate influence in parliament, and be a little dot that's part of the eu.
yup, freedom.. but anyway, as it stands right now they have 48 seats after getting 1.2m votes.
How long can they deny Scotland has the right to determine its own future. Do they seriously intend to keep Scotland in the UK against its will?
^^^ *sigh*
We've been through this point several times previously.
Scotland is in the UK due to its will - voting Remain in IndyRef 2014.
Boris Johnson and his Tory government are respecting that IndyRef result. Boris, the UK Prime Minister, also has a democratic mandate to deliver on the withdrawal of the UK from the EU, which he's getting on with.
it occurs to me the gb probably dont have much experience when it comes (!
) to marital sex guidance, so i think its only fair and reasonable we should put together a few hints to help them publish a suitable guide.. it is well known a lot of jw's get married in order to have sex, and all to frequently the marriages fail, possibly due to sexual problems, so the watchtower guide to sex should prove to be very worthwhile.. any jw courting couple intending to get married should be allowed to have a copy of the guide, and should only be available by a special order through the body of elders.. copies are not available to any single bros and sisters.. all and any advice in it must adhere to bible principles, and certainly no salty language or smut will be allowed.. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
so--to get this started--and in no particular order--here is my first suggestion:.
Sorry to go off on one, but ...
Watchtower: "Thus, a mate’s enforcing perverted acts, such as oral or anal sex, within the marriage … "
^^^ Would be rape (enforcing).
WTF is wrong with the WTS? Jeez!
Any sexual act that is forced or enforced is rape/abuse/coercion.
Adult couples (married or not) can decide for themselves what they want to do in private.
They don't need advice from a group of elderly men who probably aren't getting any, lol.
...having been released half way through his sentence from prison only weeks ago - for terror offences.. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51351844.
Well done to the police for shooting the terrorist dead.
Where he belongs, six feet under.
corona-virus facts.
in china, people generally do not wash their hands.
there is no soap in restrooms or even in hospitals.
The following video isn't necessarily a coronavirus fact, it's more like a coronavirus suggestion.
The Chinese eat bat soup.
And, this video suggests that the coronavirus is genetically speaking, very similar to a virus found in bats.
And bat soup is popular in Wuhan.
hi guys...well watchtower gets wackier and wackier!.
so watchtower has hired the author of several books on satanism & self proclaimed 'vampire' society member(!
) vlad...i mean massimo introvigne to defend them against a report by two academics recommending the dutch govt investigate jws.
Vell, Watchtower, I vill defend you ...
Mwa ha ha ha ha!!!
here, in the us, we go to the "bathroom".
am i taking a bath?
we either poop or pee.. when we go to canada, we go to the "washroom".
I guess it's just general politeness and manners, RubaDub.
Saying "I'm just going to spend a penny" is much nicer than saying "I've got turtle-neck - I'm just going to take a hot, steaming dump".
And "I just need to powder my nose" is so much nicer than "I've just hit the pad with my Devil's Waterfall - it's worse than the school prom scene from Carrie (1976) down here!"
