'Saddam's Palace May Be New U.S. Embassy'

by sf 90 Replies latest social current

  • sf
    sf
    Saddam's Palace May Be New U.S. Embassy - 12-12-2003
    U.S. bombs never hit Saddam Hussein's grandiose presidential palace in Baghdad, making its ample meeting rooms and vast conference tables an ideal headquarters for U.S.-led occupation authorities after the war.

    [ By JIM KRANE, Associated Press Writer

    BAGHDAD, Iraq - U.S. bombs never hit Saddam Hussein ( news - web sites )'s grandiose presidential palace in Baghdad, making its ample meeting rooms and vast conference tables an ideal headquarters for U.S.-led occupation authorities after the war.

    Now the building — the physical seat and biggest symbol of Saddam's 23-year dictatorship — is the likely site for the next U.S. Embassy in Iraq ( news - web sites), U.S. officials in Washington and Iraq said this week.

    A State Department official in Washington, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the palace is among several locations under consideration for the embassy, where the U.S. government's official representative will be based after power is handed over to an Iraqi government by July 1.

    Critics say the move will show the world that the U.S. intends to remain the true power in Iraq.

    Currently the building, sealed inside a U.S.-occupied neighborhood that sprawls alongside the Tigris River in central Baghdad, holds the headquarters of the Coalition Provisional Authority, the U.S.-led entity that oversees Iraq.

    If the transition goes as planned, the CPA will be dissolved and U.S. affairs will be directed from the same building, which will become the embassy, a coalition official said on condition of anonymity.

    "Although the CPA will cease to exist on July 1, there will still be much work to accomplish and the U.S. will still have many interests to pursue here," the official wrote in an e-mail to The Associated Press. "Therefore, the logical replacement for CPA is an American Embassy and we expect that CPA, or at least a part of it, will evolve into the embassy."

    However, no final decision designating the palace has been made, the official said, adding that the site search was still in the early stages.

    After U.S. military columns rolled into Baghdad in April, troops set up their cots in the palace's opulent ballroom, with grubby soldiers washing themselves in its marble-walled bathrooms with gold-plated fixtures.

    Until recently, the roof of the four-story, 600-foot-long building was topped with four 30-foot-tall busts of Saddam wearing a Mogul helmet. The U.S.-led occupation administration ordered the bronze sculptures removed last week.

    A Pentagon ( news - web sites) official in Baghdad said an official survey of possible embassy sites, including the palace, will be conducted in Baghdad on Friday. Others here have said the palace is the most likely site because it's already in use, and is big and secure.

    If the building does become the U.S. Embassy, analysts say its negative symbolism as the previous seat of Iraq's dictatorship will be reinforced when U.S. representatives move in. The choice could suggest to Iraqis that the United States will remain the true power in Iraq, some said.

    "If we want to symbolize American plans to dominate Iraq after the transition to self-government, we could not choose a better site," said Richard K. Betts, director of the Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University in New York. "If we want a credible signal that we'll fade into the background after liberating the country, the choice could hardly be worse."

    If things were going well for the Americans in Iraq — and for the Iraqis themselves — such symbols might not matter.

    "Given that things are tense, security is still a problem and promised money hasn't arrived, this will be further evidence that we are up to no good," said Rachel Bronson, director of the Middle East Studies program at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.

    The State Department official said the palace may be "the real estate" that can best house the embassy — at least until a new compound can be built.

    U.S. air strikes destroyed or damaged many other buildings in the surrounding presidential compound, which lies in the security area known as the "Green Zone." But the palace, on a favorite jogging route for U.S. government workers in Iraq, sits unscathed.

    The previous U.S. Embassy, in east Baghdad's al-Mesbah section, was vacated in 1990 when the United States broke diplomatic relations with Iraq after its invasion of Kuwait. After the 1991 Gulf War ( news - web sites ) and until the U.S. invasion in March, U.S. affairs were handled at the nearby Polish Embassy.

    =====Post and read messages: http://post.news.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=NEWS&action=l&ft=1&board=37138459&sid=37138459&title=Saddam%27s%20Palace%20May%20Be%20U.S.%20Embassy%20Site%0A&tid=apiraqnewembassy&date=12-11-2003&url=story.news.yahoo.com%2Fnews%3Ftmpl%3Dstory%26u%3D%2Fap%2F20031211%2Fap_on_re_mi_ea%2Firaq_new_embassy_1&.sig=ROE_WGWc4CQikozOFvsbmw --

    sKally

  • Stacy Smith
    Stacy Smith

    I'm sure the palace can use a coat of paint and maybe even a change in artwork. How many paintings of saddem can someone stomach anyway?

    Maybe painting WANTED...DEAD across all those painting would keep them from being a total waste.

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    Bad, bad message.

    It should be used to house some kind of Iraqi related cultural center. Either that, or some kind of Iraqi version of the Playboy mansion.

  • Stacy Smith
    Stacy Smith
    Either that, or some kind of Iraqi version of the Playboy mansion.

    Oh I'm sure Uday raped his fair share of virgins in there already.

  • Euphemism
    Euphemism

    Let's see... the palace is one of the few buildings that never got hit by bombs. So that would make it a perfect location for Iraqi government headquarters, right? Oh, no, I forgot, a foreign embassy has priority over the local government.

    Are we trying to rub in the Iraqis' face that we're occupiers?

    First the no-foreign-contracts fiasco, now this. It seems that the Bush administration has learned nothing from its diplomatic and PR mistakes leading up to the war.

    How can an administration that is quite politically astute on domestic matters be so obvlivious to public opinion anywhere outside the USA?

  • DakotaRed
    DakotaRed

    Maybe it would be better to award Halliburton another multi-billion dollar contract to build a new embassy? Would that appease the left?

  • Euphemism
    Euphemism

    Oh yeah, I'm sure that there are no other suitable buildings in all of Baghdad.

  • Stacy Smith
    Stacy Smith
    Maybe it would be better to award Halliburton another multi-billion dollar contract to build a new embassy? Would that appease the left?

    Very funny Lew.

    Here we have a country that has people who are used to earning so little money per month that it would take a years wages to purchase a television yet the left wants what, a culturial center? I think they have concerns more pressing than a culturial center. Their culture is eeking out a living.

    Why convert a palace into government buildings? They have government buildings all over Bagdad anyway. I'm sure it will be well perserved as an embassey.

    We are rubbing it not in the peoples faces but in the faces of the 100,000 or so supporters of Saddem.

  • Euphemism
    Euphemism

    Stacy... I think Six was joking about a cultural center. At least, I certainly hope so.

    Why convert a palace into a government building? Because it was a government building. It was owned by the Iraqi government.

    I'm not saying that the US is wrong to use the building. I'm just saying that it's extremely insensitive and bad PR. And PR matters. Public goodwill means saved money and saved lives.

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim

    Has no one thus far commented on the US government not accepting bids for the rebuilding effort (and over 18 billion dollars) from countries that stood in our way on the Iraq issue, or did I miss it. BULLY for the US, they don't want to help us out, but they want our money...screw them.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit