I used the generic term because there's a branch that only accepts or includes the acceptance of logic (philosophy). That's called Logical Positivism.
True enough, but you didn't discuss that narrow branch. By any measure, what you claimed posovitism is, isn't it.
So, show how your definition is the same as what you claim it is, specifically, what nicolau posted. We're waiting.
There's a new term being used interchangeable to classical (from Comte) Positivism: Scientism.
Scientism isn't a new term and it's not interchangeable.
I don't think Cofty and Viviane are logical positivists because the philosophy of soul is presented with logical consistency and both deny the logical conclusion of the soul.
So far, you've demonstrated quite capably that you've no idea what posovitism is, so no idea why you think you have a valid opinion on it.
Either way, you've also presented no logic that leads to the conclusion of "souls exist". You've simply said your god gave some animals souls and then forced them into bestiality and incest. Hardly logic.
They even can't admit the soul it's not a subject for the scientific method.
First, there's nothing to admit. Second, you used science in your attempt to prove a soul. Why should I "admit" something shouldn't be done when you tried to do it?
They clearly advocates the universal use of scientific method and don't recognise any other form of knowledge as valid.
That is such lying bullshit. You keep saying it because it's all you've got. You're a typical theist, no idea WTF you are talking about and running around lying about other people at the drop of a hat. Sadly, it's exactly what to expect from people like you.