Fisherman if the DNA of a child and a man was sent to a lab to test for paternity and the results were unequivocal and just to be sure multiple samples were sent to lots of independent labs and they all came back with the same clear result would you still question it?
The strongest evidence for evolution is of exactly the same sort.
What if there was also tons and tons of evidence that the man had sex with the child's mother at the time in question?
We could go on but sooner or later rational people accept that something is proven beyond all reasonable doubt.
If there was evidence to contradict evolution then we could at least have an interesting conversation about it but there is none.
You are afraid of the possible implications of evolution being true and so you hide from the facts and pretend there are two sides to the debate. There isn't.