from what i have seen flat earthers have various oppinions on the various facets of the lights in the sky (sun/moon/stars/planets) so they dont all have the same beliefs.
for the moon landing, there is not one person here that is qualified to state that it did or did not happen, out of personal 1st hand knowledge, we can only go with our personal understanding of and willingness to believe the evidence.
on a side note, Russia, who never claimed to land men on the moon, also has a lunar reflector. without having to put a man there. so refelctors are not proof, evidence maybe but weak evidence then, unless we are willing to say Russia is covering up their own moon men. Are we saying that now? is that a thing moon landing proponents are advocating?
what i find funny, hillarious really, is that the apollo astronots couldnt remember whether space was soo dark or soo bright with stars.
its too bad those pics from luna didnt show the milkyway. you can see it from earth, i really would have liked to see it from the moons POV. but maybe its because those cameras were not made to be used in a harsh environment like space, thats straight from the manufacurers mouth but maybe thats why they didnt pick up stars and galaxies and why the shadows are at funny angles sometimes.
Oh and recent videos from our NASA friends have stated that they are still trying to figure out how to safely get through the van allen belt, and that once they figure that out, the can go further out into space like to the moon and beyond. damn all this doublespeak, feels like the Watchtower has taught the govs to speak just like them.
for those who would say "prove it" to the statement above, do i really have to hand those things to you on a silver platter? its so easy to find, if i have to hand it to you, you are being intellectually lazy.