Is there ANY evidence that suggests he was trying to hoax anyone?
You mean, other than the hoax bomb that he refused to explain?
As far as we know he always told the truth about what the device was.
By all accounts he refused to say much, ratcheting up the issue rather than explaining.
No one else was scared of the device (we know this for certainty because of no evacuations). Who was scared of the device?
Again, a hoax / imitation bomb isn't scary when you know if it a fake but can instill fear and suspicion when you don't.
I would understand the reaction if he claimed the device was a bomb.
Having a device that looks like a bomb is a form of claim.
I will grant you that his behavior that day seems strange by all reports that I have heard, so I think I would be okay with some kind of discipline given out by the school in accord with their own standards.
Yes, he deserved to be punished for doing something dumb. He doesn't deserve to be rewarded.
However I still have to ask the question Why the heck was he arrested?
Having a fake bomb and refusing to explain himself. The "I invented a clock" is the backup claim to get him out of trouble. He didn't invent a clock, he made a fake bomb.
By the way.... since when are we okay with police interrogating minors? Did the child know his rights? Was he offered representation before being questioned?
A kid that old and supposedly "bright" (I've yet to see any evidence of that) should be able to explain himself. The accounts I've heard suggest he refused to explain himself which resulted in the police being called and even then he was uncooperative. I think a child that age can be questioned.
What about everyone else's rights? He wasn't randomly pulled out of class for being brown or Muslim as some media would have is believe. He brought the attention on himself and it looks more and more like it was intentional.
He certainly hasn't suffered from what he did.