If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future
Now that reality shows you 100% made an assertion and were 100% wrong,
No it does not. You have only posted a definition of the term you cut and pasted from the net.
The age of consent/marriage varies from country to country and state to state. Other than a not veiled attempt to link gay males with pedophilia, your post is irrelevant to this discussion.
It will be no different than a 21 yr old girl marrying a 16 year old boy. Where it's legal, it's legal. And, none of your business.
Some day it may be legal for a man to marry a very young boy. It will not be considered illegal or child abuse.
Who knows? maybe someday they will make it illegal to eat animals without their consent. Or based on that animals can be eaten without their consent, they will make it legal to marry your pet without their consent. too Who knows what laws they will pass, but if you are running for public office, heads up! No more excuses like this Davis woman.
Fisherman - "JW are not fundies."
Jeezus, if JWs aren't fundies, f**king no one is.
Only joking vid. But laws are made by lawmakers and who knows what laws they will pass.
TakeOffTheCrown - "Some day it may be legal for a man to marry a very young boy. It will not be considered illegal or child abuse."
Is that your greatest fear? Or your fondest hope?
DJS - "It will be no different than a 21 yr old girl marrying a 16 year old boy. Where it's legal, it's legal. And, none of your business."
Kinda f**ked up, though, regardless.
"Prior to that 2003 ruling, homosexuals were criminals in 13 States and as early as 1986 the US Supreme Court did not find any Constitutional grounds to protect those "criminals.""
Is that what you want? If so, how would such criminalization of gays be enforced?
Marriage is an effed up institution most of the time. So yeah.
Is that what you want?
No. I only stated what the US government wanted.