NASA Identifies The Hand of God

by Perry 92 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Perry
    Perry

    It even has what looks like blood flowing from a palm wound. Article

    World-renowned astrophysicist Robert Jastrow, founding director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, explains the “fear of faith” many of today’s scientists experience.

    There is a kind of religion in science, it is the religion of a person who believes there is order and harmony in the universe, and every effect must have its cause; [but] there is no First Cause. …

    “No First Cause,” however, means there is no Creator, no God. As Jastrow continues:

    This religious faith of the scientist is violated by the discovery that the world had a beginning under conditions in which the known laws of physics are not valid, and as a product of forces or circumstances we cannot discover. When that happens, the scientist has lost control. If he really examined the implications, he would be traumatized. As usual when faced with trauma, the mind reacts by ignoring the implications – in science this is known as “refusing to speculate” – or trivializing the origin of the world by calling it the Big Bang, as if the Universe were a firecracker.

    Consider the enormity of the problem. Science has proven that the universe exploded into being at a certain moment. It asks, What cause produced this effect? Who or what put the matter and energy into the Universe? Was the Universe created out of nothing, or was it gathered together out of pre-existing materials? And science cannot answer these questions …

    “Now,” Jastrow continues, “we would like to pursue that inquiry farther back in time, but the barrier to further progress seems insurmountable. It is not a matter of another year, another decade of work, another measurement, or another theory; at this moment it seems as though science will never be able to raise the curtain on the mystery of creation.”

    The famed scientist’s ultimate conclusion is astonishingly candid, particularly in light of his own professed agnosticism: “For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountain of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.”

  • snare&racket
    snare&racket

    God is a Simpson charachter with 3 fingers......

    And a red hairy longitudinal finger on top....

    What utter nonsense!

    Also, anyone invollved in science, knows to turn the bullshit sesitivity dial up high, when people start referring to someone they quote as FAMED scientist or THE RESPECTED or THE RENOWNED...

    Scientists find data.. their opinion is nothing more than that. To go beyond the data is BAD SCIENCE.

    Their view on religion is just their view. That said the comments about theologians are nonsense, the dark ages are attributed to religions stranglehold on science. Galileo was not imprisoned by atheists!

    Either way, that is NO HAND! Though i do see a facePALM.

  • confusedandalone
    confusedandalone

    How fucking stupid is this...

  • adamah
    adamah

    It looks like sputum (i.e. a lung-cookie) with blood in it of someone with pneumonia. Whomever coughed it up should see a doctor right away!

    BTW, God's hand actually accomplished anything or moved for a LONG TIME now, so maybe it would be a good idea to check the radial pulse on the wrist to see God's still alive....

  • Perry
    Perry

    And then there is also the center of the M51 Whirlpool Galaxy:

    File:M51 whirlpool galaxy black hole.jpg

  • Twitch
  • Oubliette
    Oubliette

    Certainly a scienctific approach does not guarantee answers to every question.

    But the OP is nothing more than a return to the old "God of the Gaps" argument, albeit a fairly eloquent one.

  • prologos
    prologos

    the ill advised "we've seen the hand of god " remark was actually used by the COBE researchers when the first warmer patterns were detected in the background radiation.

    No need to use invective to deal with the subject.

    The question of first cause is a valid one, it has been been adressed by better minds than us.

    cognitive dissonance is not a wt follower monopoly.

    Perry, pretty pictures, like these you present,-- or the "face on mars",-- jesus' --"face on toast" etc., prove what?

  • Perry
    Perry

    Cause and effect runs forwards and backwards. If there is a last cause in a chain, why not a first?

  • prologos
    prologos

    because cause & effect run only FORWARD in time, there is no cause that caused the prime cause.

    The prime cause can not be an effect.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit