by jwleaks 343 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse
I’d forgotten all these old threads.
Pompous comment from Cedars on page 11:
Cedars. Have you read the NSPCC report?
I can go one better than that. I've actually consulted with the NSPCC over JW policy, so you can drop the patronizing attitude.
Which roughly translates as, 1) why are you questioning me, I’m more important than you, and 2) no I didn’t bother reading the report, because see 1)
I don't disagree with the NSPCC report. It's just talking about something almost completely different than what is being proposed. It's a shame you can't see that. I wonder why you can't.
Textbook gaslighting, also page 11.
It's just like him to play the "do you know who I am" card when he was using a pseudonym.
"Have I read it? I'll have you know that I was consulted for it!"
I recall Anonymous' posts trying to crack into WT files.
