jjj, you wrote:
I dont know if there is or isnt' something like a supreme being/s or a grand architect
but previously you wrote this:
atheists are not scientists but they claim not to believe in any god, I said it they go beyond science... are you following me? ... I can quote anyone that calls themselves atheists because to them the big bang, evolution theory, etc is enough to disprove god/s without the proof, get it? pseudocience definition theory mistaken as scientific: a theory or method doubtfully or mistakenly held to be scientific.
look, you are clearly making a strawman here. Its rather silly, you say you cant even define what God your talking about and at the same time your busy telling me i am rejecting every God because of evolution, how the heck should evolution disprove a God which is compatible with evolution?. My position (and i believe i share this with 90% of all atheists) is that any God i have heard about has insufficient evidence to be accepted as true, and often evidence that goes against it being true (like with jehovah).
on top of that its quite arrogant to say you can quote any atheist as supporting your strawman.