Another prime example of the apostates knowing their material better than the hounders. The hounders cited an article to back up a ban on posting the reception without being specific about which one or showing them the article (which should have immediately resulted in the lifting of that ban), and the apostates immediately find that article.
Perhaps the hounders should spend more time preparing to find and show the source of any ban they issue instead of creating bans on anything that might add a measure of fun to those mechanical processes that they call weddings (or creating a block that might be a "moral impediment" so they can bust up the wedding).
Which leads me to think that "moral impediment" clause is just another tool they have to keep people celibate for life or to take a spouse out from under someone's feet and give it to who they choose, while the would-have-been groom gets stuck at the Value Destroyer Training School.