On Auld Soul's thread:
Statistical effect of disassociating the inactive; http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/121008/1.ashx
Mary made an interesting comment, she said:
I can tell you right now, that if they do try and enforce shunning of inactive ones, I will go from being a passive ex-Witness to a very aggressive ex-Witness and will make sure that the media and everyone in the area I live, know what the Witnesses are doing. And that won't be a one-time deal. I'll plaster my area with my own tracts, exposing their hypocrisy, their false doctrines, their policies on child molestation and a host of other embarassing facts they prefer to keep hidden from the public. And something tells me, I won't be the only one with that reaction.
Thank you Mary. I want it to go on record that I feel the same way, and if I decide to expose the WBTS in my area it won't be a pretty sight.
What I would like to know is: How many are holding back from exposing the WBTS because they want to keep their family?
How many would make the WBTS pay if they were disfellowshipped and lost their family?