regarding the symbolic heart, I sent 2 letters to the Society regarding my question as to how they could possibly think that it was a literal heart that is spoken of in the Bible. It seemed obvious that it had to be a symbolic heart that the Bible writers referred to. The first letter I sent recieved no reply. So about 7 months later, I sent another letter asking the same thing. I did get a response and it was for me to be patient, spend my time in the life-saving ministry, and wait for the "slave" to bring out any new information to us. The next week, we got "new lite". The heart was symbolic after all. (Hey, I knew that and I'm not even professing to be anointed.)
You've got to be kidding. They really said the Bible was talking about the literal heart??
I remember when the article came out saying it was figurative, and giving all this 'proof' of it and everything...I didn't realize it was 'new light'. I remember thinking, "Why are they spending so much time trying to convince me? Isn't it obvious? Duh?"