shadow

Joined

• started 11 topics
• posted 540 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by shadow

• 
  14

  The Heresy of Neutrality

  by Perry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the one thing that keeps jw's worshiping the watchtower corporations more than (or as much as) anything else is the issue of neutrality.

  neutrality is such a benign sounding word isn't it?

  it even sounds religious.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shadow

  How many people can be killed as "collateral damage"? Ok to kill the widow next door? The children next door? 5? 10? 1,000? 100,000?
• 
  133

  What are the biggest holes in evolution?

  by shadow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how honest are the proponents of evolution?

  idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shadow

  There are some other major difficulties that I have in mind but surely they are familiar to the many who have studied the topic in depth
• 
  133

  What are the biggest holes in evolution?

  by shadow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how honest are the proponents of evolution?

  idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shadow

  How honest are the proponents of evolution? idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?
  
• 
  67

  Is proselytizing less condescending when evolutionists do it?

  by paul from cleveland in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  is it just me?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shadow

  Paul you're not alone. As usual there is no full disclosure of anything that is inconvenient to the case they are trying to make. The point is that they are telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. If you don't believe it you are either ignorant or stupid or both.
• 
  56

  Any former elders brains I could pick?

  by BarelyThere in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i posted in another topic a few hours ago.

  it is my first time on here or any website like this, ever.

  i was dfed back in september for adultery.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shadow

  Of course, that's water under the bridge now. Most posters just answering questions without making any moral judgments but too messy for me
• 
  56

  Any former elders brains I could pick?

  by BarelyThere in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i posted in another topic a few hours ago.

  it is my first time on here or any website like this, ever.

  i was dfed back in september for adultery.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shadow

  Maybe he was a bastard. Maybe she was a bitch. Nobody here knows. Either way should divorce before finding someone new
• 
  23

  Evolution is a Fact #2 - DNA Functional Redundancy

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  in the first thread in this series we looked at how the same protein molecule can be assembled by many different sequences of amino acids.. we took the example of cytochrome c and saw that there are many times more possible sequences than atoms in the known universe.

  however the sequences in humans and chimps are identical, and as we look at species less closely related to us by evolution the more differences we find.

  this is very compelling evidence for common ancestry.. in this post we are going to look more closely at the dna code behind those amino acid sequences.. the "language" of dna is made up of just 4 "letters" - a,c,g and t.. sequences of letters are read off in groups of 3 called codons.. acggcctcgaatgccttc would be read as acg gcc tcg aat gcc ttc.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shadow

  My thoughts are my own. I don't feel the need to quote a rabbi for every thing I say.

  So biological systems must be much simpler than inanimate systems since a designer is never needed
• 
  23

  Evolution is a Fact #2 - DNA Functional Redundancy

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  in the first thread in this series we looked at how the same protein molecule can be assembled by many different sequences of amino acids.. we took the example of cytochrome c and saw that there are many times more possible sequences than atoms in the known universe.

  however the sequences in humans and chimps are identical, and as we look at species less closely related to us by evolution the more differences we find.

  this is very compelling evidence for common ancestry.. in this post we are going to look more closely at the dna code behind those amino acid sequences.. the "language" of dna is made up of just 4 "letters" - a,c,g and t.. sequences of letters are read off in groups of 3 called codons.. acggcctcgaatgccttc would be read as acg gcc tcg aat gcc ttc.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shadow

  Why not a creator using the same tools? Seems to be more evidence of design than evolution
• 
  39

  To all JDub lurkers: How can you continue to preach knowing that you are telling lies?

  by macys in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  this is a damn serious question.

  you must know by now that jerusalem was not destroyed in 607 bce and that 607 was initially picked by ct russell by using his "pyramid scheme" measurements.

  there is no hiding these facts yet you continue to preach this nonsense.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shadow

  Is anyone here actually preaching anything else?

  Jhune do you preach about what you said or is that just a suggestion?
• 
  291

  Evolution is a Fact #1 - Protein Functional Redundancy

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.

  there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.

  there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  shadow

  SecretSlaveClass

  Faith has no place in science. Either you accept the evidence or you do not - in which case people who tend to base their decisions on fact would continue their examination of empirical evidence until the facts all corroborated the proposed theory. Naturally I would expect this point to be lost on emotional "believers" to whom evidence means nothing and emotional commitment means everything.

  Exactly my point! Thanks for your support!