Something that is right is right because it is right, not because the Watchtower or the Bible says so.
And vice versa.
a customer on my route with whom i have had some lively debates was his number 1 complaint is that "the witnesses have so many rules".
last month i agreed with on this issue.
he asked why the change, i told him that i have been doing some soul searching.
Something that is right is right because it is right, not because the Watchtower or the Bible says so.
And vice versa.
I started this thread because my PW has been making congregation territory wall maps and for their cards. They are paying for that. While she was traveling from the KH after a congregat's memorial service to where they had the get together, she got a speeding ticket (I was glad I had to work that day until that happened, made it so I worked for nothing.) Thereafter she stated that she needed a new computer for her designing. I told her, no you have to save for your ticket. She bought one without asking me (It was a good deal anyway). Now the credit cards are maxed.
Today the bossman called me in to work. The convention at least twice mentioned that we should not miss meetings for work or overtime. I saw screw that, hypocrites. Listening to what they say, pulls one out of the faith more than direct negative talk.
The Pioneer Wife:
In Public -
She is active in service,
used in demonstrations and other meeting parts,
helps at Kingdom Hall builds and other projects,
There for all of the social occasions,
At home -
Disrespects husband of any status,
runs up the credit card,
neglects the home,
teaches the kids only to count time.
i'm really interested in this question because i've heard for years that if you forgo further education and go pioneering, when you have a family down the track you will get a good job because jehovah will provide for you because you pioneered.
as long as i was a kool-aid drinker, even then, i thought, "how does pioneering pay your bills?
surely education should come first.
I followed their counsel on marrying only in the Lord and I got screwed for that financially. and every other way.
just yesterday at the airport i dropped my wallet coming out of a shop and a very kind man picked it up and ran up to me and asked "excuse me is this yours?
" to which i gave a startled but relieved reply of "yes, thankyou very much!"..
i was amazed by his honesty & kindness for doing this deed and wondered for a moment what would have happened if he'd have put it in his pocket instead.
Yes and no. I have been looking at the things that humans have created and how that is the purpose in life.
But No, the fact the government of the people is too heavy handed and there is no mercy or caring out ther.
hi there, this is my first post, but i've been buzzing around this site for years.. i got married at 18, hubby was 20, i was a regular pioneer and we were talking about serving in bethel.
fast forward - i left in 2004 after a 5 year battle with my conscience, family and friends who kept insisting that i was just "weak and needed to have another bible study".
however hubby and i stayed together although it was kinda on the understanding that we would just not talk about it.
walls of jericho said "Divorce is not unscriptural".
That is incorrect. Besides my hating that word 'scriptural', it does say that Jehovah is hating a divorce so he does not want that.
It is just that legal action does not break the marriage ties. But when one has sex with another that breaks the ties because it forms new ones.
That is what happened in Israel. They didn't have weddings. They had sex and that made them married.
So by Jesus' words, the divorce would make the one feel free to remarry but that would not not be free. Then that 2nd marriage would break the first bonds and form new ones. It would not be an adulterous marriage as there is no such thing. Only that moment was adulterous.
in acts 7:59, the jews were casting stones at stephen and his last words were, "lord jesus, receive my spirit.".
the wts has contended that all of the ancients who died after jesus were in a sleep-like condition, awaiting a resurrection that eventually happened in 1918-1919 (depending upon which wt reference you are looking at).
and in fact, v. 60 says stephen "fell asleep in death".
What makes one think that Stephen or anyone else inthe first century knew anything to be considered right about such subjects?
Stephen was not an inspired prophet.
Stephen was just a guy who was not good at dodgeball.
i received the following explanation in favor of the date of 607 bce.
accepted comments on the points at issue.. .
conclusion.
'"genile times' is an ultimately meaningless term rooted in allegory and folklore."
That may be true, but I was addressing how they are barking up the wrong tree on this oft argued and misconstrued issue.
i received the following explanation in favor of the date of 607 bce.
accepted comments on the points at issue.. .
conclusion.
Why does it matter?
The beginning of the gentile times is not based on the destruction of Jerusalem. Only the WTS tradition is. Because the WTS is hard headed, they want to stick with Russell's reasoning (though they changed everything else). And everyone against the WTS goes against that.
The gentile times is based on when the promise to David got paused. Jehvoah told David that he seed That is not about the destruction of Jerusalem but when the kings in the line of David lost their sovereignty. Since they lost that before the destruction of Jerusalem, then it does not matter when Jerusalem was destroyed.
2 Sam 7:12 "I shall certainly raise up your seed after you, which will come out of your inward parts; and I shall indeed firmly establish his kingdom. 13 He is the one that will build a house for my name, and I shall certainly establish the throne of his kingdom firmly to time indefinite. 14 I myself shall become his father, and he himself will become my son. When he does wrong, I will also reprove him with the rod of men and with the strokes of the sons of Adam. 15 As for my loving-kindness, it will not depart from him the way I removed it from Saul, whom I removed on account of you. 16 And your house and your kingdom will certainly be steadfast to time indefinite before you; your very throne will become one firmly established to time indefinite.”’”
That is for David, then Solomon then on to be kings in Jerusalem on down to Jesus. Well, Jesus never became king. So what happened. The Gentile times.
"your very throne will become one firmly established ". Prior to Jerusalem's destruction the throne was lost when they were invaded and were subject to other nations and that started the gentile times when then ended in 1914.
i"m listening to the 2013 dc green bay saturday talk on false gods.. the speaker says no one would knowingly worship false deities.
but could we inadvertantly give jehovah less than exclusive devotion he deserves.. he said:you have not allowed this deception power of sin to sensual desires, material comforts, pets, technology, entertainment or food to become objects of devotion to you.. anything that interferes with our spiriutal routine has the power of eroding or weaking our relationship with jehovah.. .
my dogs can erode my relationship with jehovah.
I"m listening to the 2013 DC Green Bay Saturday talk on False Gods.
The speaker says no one would knowingly worship false deities. But could we inadvertantly give Jehovah less than exclusive devotion he deserves.
He said:You have not allowed this deception power of sin to sensual desires, material comforts, PETS, technology, entertainment or food to become objects of devotion to you.
Anything that interferes with our spiriutal routine has the power of eroding or weaking our relationship with Jehovah.
Really?
My dogs can erode my relationship with Jehovah. Maybe because I would rather spend time with then then the people at the Hall because my dogs
have unconditional love and are not judgmental. Dogs need food, water, instruction and caring and teaching just like children.
What may hurt my relationship with Jehovah is realizing that humans that make things upgrade them.
Jehovah created dogs but why not make dog 2.0 that can talk.
They grow and mature and learn faster than humans, but never were given that part of the brain that can form language.